(no subject)
Jul. 5th, 2006 01:35 pm
Two interesting things in this article:
First, despite constant searches and the pictured use of shotguns to get into inaccessible areas, these searches "respect rights and property".
Second, that perfect example of safety-providing Army manhood is Steven Green, the private who, along with other members of his unit, abducted, raped, and murdered a 15-year-old girl, and murdered her family.
"He had found direction in his life, something important and something that he really wanted to do."
Yeah, we can tell. Be all you can be, and all that.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-05 08:51 pm (UTC)I think it's the same provision that prohibits the use of .50 cal rifles against human targets.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-05 09:07 pm (UTC)#2: I wasn't aware of any such prohibition. This is not to say it isn't there, just that I don't know it.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-05 09:21 pm (UTC)It's listed as #6. The prohibition isn't as total as I'd thought. And I'm aware of breeching guns, but as he doesn't appear to be carrying any other longarm, the shotgun would seem to be his primary weapon in the event of combat.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-05 10:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-05 11:02 pm (UTC)Shotguns are used as offensive weapons in combat. It's perfectly acceptable, given how the nature of warfare has changed since the inception of the Geneva Conventions.
The prohibition on .50 BMG weapons on human targets is also routinely bypassed. We normally use mounted 7.62 C6 Machine Guns. But we are bringing the M2HB back.
Our .50 sniper rifles are also used on human beings. How else can you reach out and touch someone at 2.4+ kilometres?