(no subject)

Date: 2006-12-24 03:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ed-dirt.livejournal.com
Dude..photoshopped.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-12-24 04:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelik-fiona.livejournal.com
I think its cute non the less

(no subject)

Date: 2006-12-24 03:31 pm (UTC)
frith: (horse)
From: [personal profile] frith
Not photoshopped! Look at the teat!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-12-24 03:32 pm (UTC)
frith: Cosgrove/Onuki (anime retelling) (coverz)
From: [personal profile] frith
Promo for Barnyard II?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-12-24 06:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ed-dirt.livejournal.com
I could move a teat that much easy.

There is not even a hint of shadow beneath the lamb, plus the lamb is too well lit to be in the shadow of the cow.

I say it's photoshopped.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-12-25 02:03 am (UTC)
frith: (horse)
From: [personal profile] frith
I don't doubt that you could excise, rotate and paste in the teat in Photoshop, but what I do doubt is that it would occur to you or to anyone else to do so when it would be so much easier to leave the teat straight and just paste the lamb so that it lines up with a straight teat. As for the shadows and illumination, the sky is overcast and the light is soft. Shadows are diffuse and the lamb is a whiter subject than the cow. I'm still not convinced.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 30th, 2026 07:25 pm