go digging.. man i never even had to go that far.. i jsut bribed the guy behind the counter.. turns out that the fine for selling a minor porn is tiny.. haha
Too funny! Cannot top your quip. Note in this quality survey that 40% turns into an assumed majority of high school students and that there may be a link between seeing porn and depression in teens.
I actually saw far more uninvited porn than invited porn for years, until I mastered the art of adblocking. For people who had to use IE 6 before the invention of popup blockers, if they didn't know how to disable them manually in the advanced functions? I can certainly see that being a problem.
And since the kinds in question are, by definition, clueless, I really to believe that they honestly said "I saw porn that I didn't look for".
I suppose it depends on the way the question was phrased. I was envisioning them denying intentionally looking at porn as opposed to admitting to having seen unintentional porn.
Yes, but what i'm wondering about is ho many of those who waved the banner of "uninvited porn" have also intentionally looked at porn and used their unintentional times as a cover.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-05 04:35 pm (UTC)Ahh, progress.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-05 05:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-05 05:20 pm (UTC)qualitysurvey that 40% turns into an assumed majority of high school students and that there may be a link between seeing porn and depression in teens.(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-05 06:18 pm (UTC)To me, that is the bigger lie .p
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-05 06:24 pm (UTC)And since the kinds in question are, by definition, clueless, I really to believe that they honestly said "I saw porn that I didn't look for".
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-05 06:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-05 08:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-05 09:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-05 09:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-05 09:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-06 12:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-08 11:38 am (UTC)