(no subject)

Date: 2007-02-12 05:28 pm (UTC)
ext_195307: (Self portrait)
It certainly would convince me. Which is the problem. If any vaguely post-medieval reader can realize that the jury's decision was just plain wrong, there are two alternatives that I can see: Either a majority of imbeciles have been drafted into jury duty, or the jury knows something we don't. The latter seems the most likely. (Even though as a foreigner, I would get a kick out of believing Americans really were that primitive.)

Ironically, I would have believed it easily if it wasn't so over the top. If there is the slightest doubt, even a Scandinavian jury would let a man off, since people have sex voluntarily under the most offbeat circumstances. It is the lack of any credible doubt that makes me suspicious. "Credo quia absurdum."
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 12:59 pm