(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 05:36 pm (UTC)
There was no such intent here. . . .

Oh, I disagree. He and his cohorts disagreed about the would-be protestors' constitutional right to congregate and express protected free speech.

Had he/they personally known the targets in advance, your argument might have worked; one could then invoke an existing personal relationship between target and nutjob to avoid the general "terrorist" umbrella.

(I do agree that protesting at a funeral is poor in taste, but it is protected.)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 01:06 pm