(no subject)
Jul. 31st, 2007 11:26 amArizona court rules that women are 80% as valuable as 7-week embryos.
Look on the positive side: that's still 133% of what black people are worth according to the US Constitution.
Look on the positive side: that's still 133% of what black people are worth according to the US Constitution.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 03:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 05:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 05:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 05:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 05:35 pm (UTC)Well, I'm off to talk to a few nice gentlemen with (much nicer) daughters and (not very nice) shotguns, then!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 05:42 pm (UTC)(If you have no brothers, brothers will be provided.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 05:53 pm (UTC)I'll tell S. to start praying; for my ego's sake, I won't ask what she's praying for.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 06:13 pm (UTC)hugs,
e
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 07:24 pm (UTC)> and 20 for the unborn child, but...i think the judge just really
> wanted to make sure that the guy went away for a long time.
Both deaths were second degree murder.
The maximum penalty for that in Arizona is life imprisonment.
Clearly there's some discretion as to the severity of the sentence, or else Gurrola would have been put away for life wether or not Sanchez was pregnant. So if the goal is to make sure he was jailed for a long time, why not simply put him away for life? Heck, given the presence of the fetus, you can even put him away for life twice.
> he committed a terrible crime; he beat a pregnant woman to death.
That is in fact the attitude, yes.
> unfortunately, americans MUST quantify everything, and since you
> can't say that a crime against a pregnant woman is somehow worse
> than a crime against an unfertilized woman because.....well,
> because...
Given that they're considered as two separate crimes, I'm not sure how relevant it is to the law that Sanchez was pregnant. I mean, there was Sanchez dying from brain damage due to the beating, which didn't get the maximum sentance for second-degree murder. And then there was the fetus dying due to being deprived of its life-support system (Sanchez!), which still didn't get the maximum sentance for second-degree murder, but was considered a worse crime.
> then you have to legally give the fetus some rights,
> so that it counts.
(Or, you know, in the absence of the fetus being considered a person, you could simply impose life imprisonment on the guilty party.)
> it's annoying, i know, but at least the guy is going to go away for
> a long time for his crime.
Crimes.
You know, both the *really* bad one, and then the one which involved beating his girlfriend so badly that he gave her brain damage that eventually killed her.
That he's going away for killing his girlfriend? Okay.
That the death of a six-week old fetus is treated as the murder of a human being? I would not call that okay.
That the death of a six-week old clump of cells that could (possibly) have turned into a human rates a harsher punishment than the death of a living, thinking human being? That goes so far in the opposite direction of okay that "offensive" does not, to my mind, quite cover it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 07:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 07:56 pm (UTC)if the judge had the ability to impose two life-sentences and he didn't....that's just deplorable.
*sigh* i was really trying to see the bright side of this verdict. i blame the Right.
hugs,
e
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-31 08:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-01 12:27 pm (UTC)Would you be more pissed if someone totalled your brand new car or your rusty old one? It's economics with a slighly uncomomng utility formula being used :P
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-02 01:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-02 01:14 am (UTC)