(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-12 09:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elffin.livejournal.com
Can we PLEASE make it come out of the salary of the moron who made the decision?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-12 09:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kafziel.livejournal.com
On the one hand, the idea that the damages payment is reduced according to proportional fault is a pretty long-standing legal tradition, and makes a lot of sense, particularly compared to the system it's replacing of "If you are at all at fault, no case".

On the other hand, that's a goddamned NEGLIGENCE system. That's not fucking supposed to be for RAPE.

Good to see that the assholes who decided that got overturned on appeal, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-12 10:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
Sandra McNeill, of the Campaign to End Rape, called for an inquiry. She said: "No woman is responsible for being raped. A man knows what he is doing and it is never the woman's fault."

Amen.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-12 11:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sparkindarkness.livejournal.com
It is vileness itself. This kind of idiocy should be dead for decades, it is a mark of shame for the whole system and nation that this crap continues

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 5th, 2026 04:59 pm