I don't need no stinkin' context.
Mar. 1st, 2009 06:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
theweaselkingI'm curious to see some results from my personal Peanut Gallery, on this.
As always, poll results do not indicate what the law *is*. I just want to know what people *think* the law is. For the benefit of this, I'm assuming that we're discussing copyright law as it applies to countries which are subject to the Berne Convention.
[Poll #1357882]
As always, poll results do not indicate what the law *is*. I just want to know what people *think* the law is. For the benefit of this, I'm assuming that we're discussing copyright law as it applies to countries which are subject to the Berne Convention.
[Poll #1357882]
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-01 11:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-01 11:14 pm (UTC)So if you want part with no percentage, just tick the first one and none of the rest.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-01 11:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-01 11:17 pm (UTC)-- Steve briefly earned a living cranking IP out for others (yay,
sharecroppingwork-for-hire) but hasn't done so for over a decade now.(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-01 11:18 pm (UTC)-- Steve fails to look outside the (ticky) box.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-01 11:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-01 11:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-01 11:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-01 11:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-01 11:42 pm (UTC)-- Steve thinks he left a chunk of IQ in storage somewhere this weekend.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 12:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 12:14 am (UTC)Curious
Date: 2009-03-02 12:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 12:18 am (UTC)"After you looked up "estoppel" on Wikipedia, was your answer to the last question correct?"
You mean, my answer to question 5 or to question 6?
*needs coffee*
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 01:40 am (UTC)Fair use is a four-part test, where two of the factors are "amount used" and "purpose of the use." The other two are "effect" and "nature of the work."
Parody is a fair use defense, per Acuff-Rose.
Estoppel has a bunch of meanings, you know.
I bet there are more affirmative defenses than I listed. I only listed the ones I was sure about.
The image linking could depend on policy of the owner. Personally, I think linking without images is both legal and most correct.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 01:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 01:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 02:04 am (UTC)Re: Curious
Date: 2009-03-02 02:05 am (UTC)"For the benefit of this, I'm assuming that we're discussing copyright law as it applies to countries which are subject to the Berne Convention."
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 02:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 03:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 03:35 am (UTC)Re: Curious
Date: 2009-03-02 03:36 am (UTC)Sorry, I thought at first you meant a PREVIOUS post, not this one. :P My bad.
Yeah.. My eyes tend to go from subject to poll. I missed the text in between. Again, my bad.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 03:44 am (UTC)"ecru" turns up regularly in French-language clothing catalogues. That it happens to also be a word in English appears to me to be somewhat tangential.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 04:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 04:26 am (UTC)And precedent states that parody is a form of fair use.
ALSO
Date: 2009-03-02 05:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 05:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 05:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 05:32 am (UTC)Personally, I think it's more accurate as "things are wrong," but it'll do.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 05:51 am (UTC)Besides, you make up for people like me. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 05:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 12:48 pm (UTC)Re: ALSO
Date: 2009-03-02 01:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 01:38 pm (UTC)And yes, several of the questions have intentionally tricky, misleading, or redundant answers. But take a look at the difference in the results for "Parody" versus "Fair Use" and I think you'll start to see why I split them up that way.
Re: ALSO
Date: 2009-03-02 04:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 04:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 05:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 05:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 05:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 05:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-02 06:04 pm (UTC)