(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-23 09:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] evilgrins.livejournal.com
Verily...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-23 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
Flash fried sushi, anyone?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-23 10:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] plantyhamchuk.livejournal.com
Pretttttty. You are helping me to fill my hard drive with AWESOME.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-23 10:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jagash.livejournal.com
Very enlightening.

Oh, attack of Moose.

http://www.cbc.ca/cp/Oddities/090320/K032004AU.html

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-24 02:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cantkeepsilent.livejournal.com
The fish are fine. I have heard scuba divers say that the most beautiful thing they've ever seen is a lightning strike that they were ten feet underneath.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-24 03:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
WOW... I wonder how that works? when everything around you is conductive, nothing and everything closes the circuit?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-24 03:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Everything around you is conductive.

*YOU* are not conductive.

The path of least resistance is not, in any way, through you.[1]

Now, there's enough electricity that if you're too close to the surface, your great relative resistance isn't going to save you from a shock. All that electricity has to go *somewhere* - but I'm not surprised to learn it dissipates in a hurry.


[1]: I don't think "submerged in water" could act as a Faraday cage, but I'm not sure. There's a reason I avoided EM and power courses after third year.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-24 03:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cantkeepsilent.livejournal.com
My understanding is that the lightning diffuses almost entirely across the surface. Apparently, it's a starburst sort of thing if you're looking up at it. I couldn't find any pics on Google, of course the probability that you're there in the first place is infinitessimal much less that you have a camera ready to go.

Of course, you'd be shitting a brick trying to get back in the boat and get that huge piece of metal off your back.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-24 03:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
Ah! Thank you.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-24 03:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aeduna.livejournal.com
AWEsome.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-24 05:37 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-24 07:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silmaril.livejournal.com
*compares the apparent width of the (closer) pier to the apparent width of the widest bolt there*

*feels even smaller*

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-24 11:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harper-knight.livejournal.com
Some of the apparent width of those bolts is burn-in from the awesome amount of light in an otherwise fairly dark frame.. the camera would over-expose them a lot (You can see how fuzzy the main bolts are compared to the smaller forks).

Still. Not all of it.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 8th, 2026 12:19 am