(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 12:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
Well,... that's ONE way to track his growth...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 12:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snobahr.livejournal.com
That does not appear to slow him down, judging by his expression. And my son had the same shoes on the 2 sets previous to the photo-kid's current!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 01:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] singingnettle.livejournal.com
Huhn. It should be a no-brainer, but I never really thought about the fact that kids with prosthetics need progressively bigger ones.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 03:07 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 04:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peristaltor.livejournal.com
At least he won't grow out of his shoes every month.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 08:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-colombian.livejournal.com
That is just awesome.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 08:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mentalfirewall.livejournal.com
On the other hand he might grow out of his legs...
Actually I remember reading that this kid was really active and had a set of legs for nearly any eventuality, even one of those curved metal running sets.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 08:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unknownpoltroon.livejournal.com
Wow. Invisible amputee brothers.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 12:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
What I'd like to know is: why were the legs realistic at first, and now look much more mechanical?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] opaqueplanet.livejournal.com
Mechanical ones are much better for active five-year-olds (better joints, stronger materials, hydraulics, etc). Infants don't need that; they just need to get used to having prosthetics, and realistic ones are easier on parents who are still adjusting to the idea that their perfect new baby is missing some pieces.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 03:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
Wow, that's a really good answer.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 04:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gothpanda.livejournal.com
He looks so *happy*. It makes me smile back at him.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-10 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jokemanandpeppy.livejournal.com
Could the more realistic legs also help the kid. Babies have been known to have some wild abilities, and I wonder if some thought, that having more real looking legs would help him adjust better.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-12 01:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scixual.livejournal.com
That's kinda cute, actually. I hope his family is well-off, or they have a pet prostheticist. Wait till he gets special-use legs, like the grasshopper spring thing running legs!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-13 06:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snap-wilson.livejournal.com
Cute kid, great smile. The picture makes me a little sad, but the look on his face says that he's happy with what he's still got.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 10th, 2026 08:26 am