(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-10 04:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ursulav.livejournal.com
Dude, that's just awesome.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-10 04:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seriesfinale.livejournal.com
Wake me up when we start chatting with ET

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-10 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skiriki.livejournal.com
Speaking astronomically, Betelgeuse has been shrinking for the last 16 years, and has gone down in size by 15%. Some astronomers suspect that the star (which is 430 ly away) may have already exploded.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/10/betelgeuse_shrinkage/

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-17 11:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] corruptedjasper.livejournal.com
Hm. What would the local consequences be of having a supernova going off at 430 ly?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-17 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skiriki.livejournal.com
My limited understanding of supernova physics is that we're safe as long as it doesn't happen within 100 ly (from sheer material outburst), that it would result a patch of light on the sky as bright as full moon (thereabouts) for a couple of months, and that thanks to the axis of the star being pointed away from us, we're not susceptible to gamma bursts coming off from the poles (since those can apparently go further than 100 ly).

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-17 06:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Disco party!

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 05:45 am