Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 04:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] triplemare.livejournal.com
It's very, I dunno,...Snowcrashian, Tek Wars or even ShadowRunish. Anywhere the sole purpose of any computer seems to be to drop out of RL into the virtual information world.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 04:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scifantasy.livejournal.com
This is bad? As His Weaselly Majesty said, a lot of people use Windows like that. Plus, when you consider that Chrome OS is targeted at netbooks and other ultra-light, always-connected computers...
From: [identity profile] triplemare.livejournal.com
I never said (or meant to imply) that it was bad. Just that as an idea, it's been done in multiple sci-fi stories already. On the whole, I think it's nifty for those folks who do use their computer mostly to access the web, etc.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 04:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhoye.livejournal.com
09:32 < mhoye> Hey, woo. New Google OS in the works.
09:33 < mhoye> Forces of... LINUX ON THE DESKTOP!
09:33 < mhoye> Forces of... THIN CLIENTS!
09:33 < mhoye> Unite to form... um...
09:33 < mhoye> Wait.
09:33 < ted> the announcement says it's aimed at netbooks
09:33 < ted> which makes me wonder what the difference is from android
09:33 < mhoye> No, wait. Something awesome is supposed to happen there in that last step.
09:34 < mhoye> But I can't think of what it would be.
09:34 < ted> hah

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krinndnz.livejournal.com
Top applications I use on Windows:
  • Firefox (tons of stuff, especially with the plugin ecology)
  • Google Chrome (primary gmail client)
  • Safari (secondary gmail client)
  • PuTTY (work, IRC)
  • iTunes (could be replaced by Pandora or Last.fm or di.fm probably)
  • Notepad++ (being replaced by emacs slowly)
  • MU* client (being replaced by PuTTY slowly).

So, guilty as charged.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 05:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pope-guilty.livejournal.com
I read Snow Crash about once a year, and having done so, I'm currently in my "WHERE'S THE ENDING STEPHENSON? THAT IS A CLIMAX NOT A DENOUEMONT" mode.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 05:45 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
I read it for the first time last month. And yeah, ending not there is a bit of a problem.

Good, but a bit...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 05:47 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
I installed Ubuntu last week. It has apps pre-installed I've actually used.

The games section. They can run in the background before I browse. 90% of my paid work is online these days, I suspect this will keep my old desktop in use for a few more years as a backup, etc.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 05:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Chrome really is a redesign from the ground up, and a lot of the design decisions are good ones. What I'd *really* like is for Google to put some work into porting Firefox over to Chrome - get proper add-in functionality going, convert the most useful of the add-ons, publish a useful API, and, for REAL magic that would make me swap immediately and never go back, find a way to make firefox extensions work in Chrome (without just running Firefox inside the tab).

I also want a pony.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 05:50 pm (UTC)
ext_195307: (Computer)
From: [identity profile] itlandm.livejournal.com
This would have made more sense if Chrome was actually Linux-compatible, instead of Windows-only.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 05:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Why?

It's not Linux. Or, at least, not entirely so. It's an OS designed to run Chrome and basically nothing else.

Windows as Thin Client

Date: 2009-07-10 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com
*shrug* For a long time, I used Windows in almost that way (it also supported Excel and either Netterm (telnet) or PuTTy (SSH)). Files were on the file server; everything I did that wasn't in the browser or Excel was done in Linux or BSD via telnet/SSH or X. And most of the time Excel wasn't running.

Oh. Wait. I forgot. I'm still using Windows to run Excel. It's just that now I do it over VNC from a Mac. At some point I'll get around to checking degrees of Excel file format compatability of native Mac spreadsheets ...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com
Except for using Firefox as a secondary to Opera, using vi and nail via SSH to BSD and Linux machines instead of Notepad and a GUI MUA, and not running iTunes because I had too many browser tabs open to spare the RAM, that's very close to how I use Windows. (I do install Cygwin/X when I have to use a Windows machine, so I can run GUI apps from other rmachines in the house, and that does give me a local tcsh and vi just in case ...)

Re: Windows as Thin Client

Date: 2009-07-10 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
You know that *excel itself* runs on OSX, right?

Also: OpenOffice is 100% compatible with excel, and runs on Macs.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 06:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ryusen.livejournal.com
Yeah, unless my personal bandwidth becomes colossal to the point i can use Lightroom and Photoshop "int he cloud," that's not happening for me

Oh.

Date: 2009-07-10 06:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com
Well I do now.

(Wait, does it run on PPC or just Intel Macs? Never mind, I'll Google it. Clue accepted, thanks.)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 06:21 pm (UTC)
ext_195307: (Computer)
From: [identity profile] itlandm.livejournal.com
Well, it is a rather asymmetric relationship. They are using the Linux core and asking the open source milieu to work with them, yet they are not giving anything back. It would have made sense to first make sure Chrome runs on Linux and then branch out with their own distro.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 06:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
Honestly, most people use the computer for internet access and office suite stuff (which google has) and maybe for hosting pictures (which google has) ... I can't think of much your average user does on a computer that google doesn't do online. It won't be the right OS for me, but I was never going to m ove away from linux anyway.

But maybe it will get people off windows. Who needs a clunky OS whose only job is getting spyware and viruses when you can have a machine that just takes you to the net?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
they'll put out chrome for linux. They're just focusing on this first and i can see why.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 06:54 pm (UTC)
ext_195307: (Embarrassed)
From: [identity profile] itlandm.livejournal.com
And they will no doubt get their one-sided support from the open source community, because so many open source people carry an irrational hate toward Microsoft. Never mind that ChromeOS will probably take a proportionally larger bite out of other Linux distros' tiny market share than of Windows.

Re: Windows as Thin Client

Date: 2009-07-10 07:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandchigger.livejournal.com
You can also import the vast majority of your Excel work to GoogleDocs, unless you're working with huge spreadsheets or spreadsheets that access spreadsheets that access spreadsheets.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
He always does that. Act III is always lucky if it gets 2% of the book.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 07:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Games, but a good chunk of those you can get online, too.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 07:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
I didn't know the open source people were in it for market share, i.e., money.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-10 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elffin.livejournal.com
they're in it for market share i.e. anything not Microsoft.

This sweeping generalisation brought to you by the letter IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 09:23 am