It's very, I dunno,...Snowcrashian, Tek Wars or even ShadowRunish. Anywhere the sole purpose of any computer seems to be to drop out of RL into the virtual information world.
This is bad? As His Weaselly Majesty said, a lot of people use Windows like that. Plus, when you consider that Chrome OS is targeted at netbooks and other ultra-light, always-connected computers...
I never said (or meant to imply) that it was bad. Just that as an idea, it's been done in multiple sci-fi stories already. On the whole, I think it's nifty for those folks who do use their computer mostly to access the web, etc.
09:32 < mhoye> Hey, woo. New Google OS in the works. 09:33 < mhoye> Forces of... LINUX ON THE DESKTOP! 09:33 < mhoye> Forces of... THIN CLIENTS! 09:33 < mhoye> Unite to form... um... 09:33 < mhoye> Wait. 09:33 < ted> the announcement says it's aimed at netbooks 09:33 < ted> which makes me wonder what the difference is from android 09:33 < mhoye> No, wait. Something awesome is supposed to happen there in that last step. 09:34 < mhoye> But I can't think of what it would be. 09:34 < ted> hah
I installed Ubuntu last week. It has apps pre-installed I've actually used.
The games section. They can run in the background before I browse. 90% of my paid work is online these days, I suspect this will keep my old desktop in use for a few more years as a backup, etc.
Chrome really is a redesign from the ground up, and a lot of the design decisions are good ones. What I'd *really* like is for Google to put some work into porting Firefox over to Chrome - get proper add-in functionality going, convert the most useful of the add-ons, publish a useful API, and, for REAL magic that would make me swap immediately and never go back, find a way to make firefox extensions work in Chrome (without just running Firefox inside the tab).
*shrug* For a long time, I used Windows in almost that way (it also supported Excel and either Netterm (telnet) or PuTTy (SSH)). Files were on the file server; everything I did that wasn't in the browser or Excel was done in Linux or BSD via telnet/SSH or X. And most of the time Excel wasn't running.
Oh. Wait. I forgot. I'm still using Windows to run Excel. It's just that now I do it over VNC from a Mac. At some point I'll get around to checking degrees of Excel file format compatability of native Mac spreadsheets ...
Except for using Firefox as a secondary to Opera, using vi and nail via SSH to BSD and Linux machines instead of Notepad and a GUI MUA, and not running iTunes because I had too many browser tabs open to spare the RAM, that's very close to how I use Windows. (I do install Cygwin/X when I have to use a Windows machine, so I can run GUI apps from other rmachines in the house, and that does give me a local tcsh and vi just in case ...)
Well, it is a rather asymmetric relationship. They are using the Linux core and asking the open source milieu to work with them, yet they are not giving anything back. It would have made sense to first make sure Chrome runs on Linux and then branch out with their own distro.
Honestly, most people use the computer for internet access and office suite stuff (which google has) and maybe for hosting pictures (which google has) ... I can't think of much your average user does on a computer that google doesn't do online. It won't be the right OS for me, but I was never going to m ove away from linux anyway.
But maybe it will get people off windows. Who needs a clunky OS whose only job is getting spyware and viruses when you can have a machine that just takes you to the net?
And they will no doubt get their one-sided support from the open source community, because so many open source people carry an irrational hate toward Microsoft. Never mind that ChromeOS will probably take a proportionally larger bite out of other Linux distros' tiny market share than of Windows.
You can also import the vast majority of your Excel work to GoogleDocs, unless you're working with huge spreadsheets or spreadsheets that access spreadsheets that access spreadsheets.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 04:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 04:33 pm (UTC)i should have 2 cups afore I comment on blogs, really I should
Date: 2009-07-10 04:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 04:54 pm (UTC)09:33 < mhoye> Forces of... LINUX ON THE DESKTOP!
09:33 < mhoye> Forces of... THIN CLIENTS!
09:33 < mhoye> Unite to form... um...
09:33 < mhoye> Wait.
09:33 < ted> the announcement says it's aimed at netbooks
09:33 < ted> which makes me wonder what the difference is from android
09:33 < mhoye> No, wait. Something awesome is supposed to happen there in that last step.
09:34 < mhoye> But I can't think of what it would be.
09:34 < ted> hah
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 04:59 pm (UTC)So, guilty as charged.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 05:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 05:45 pm (UTC)Good, but a bit...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 05:47 pm (UTC)The games section. They can run in the background before I browse. 90% of my paid work is online these days, I suspect this will keep my old desktop in use for a few more years as a backup, etc.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 05:48 pm (UTC)I also want a pony.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 05:53 pm (UTC)It's not Linux. Or, at least, not entirely so. It's an OS designed to run Chrome and basically nothing else.
Windows as Thin Client
Date: 2009-07-10 05:56 pm (UTC)Oh. Wait. I forgot. I'm still using Windows to run Excel. It's just that now I do it over VNC from a Mac. At some point I'll get around to checking degrees of Excel file format compatability of native Mac spreadsheets ...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 06:02 pm (UTC)Re: Windows as Thin Client
Date: 2009-07-10 06:05 pm (UTC)Also: OpenOffice is 100% compatible with excel, and runs on Macs.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 06:14 pm (UTC)Oh.
Date: 2009-07-10 06:16 pm (UTC)(Wait, does it run on PPC or just Intel Macs? Never mind, I'll Google it. Clue accepted, thanks.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 06:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 06:41 pm (UTC)But maybe it will get people off windows. Who needs a clunky OS whose only job is getting spyware and viruses when you can have a machine that just takes you to the net?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 06:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 06:54 pm (UTC)Re: Windows as Thin Client
Date: 2009-07-10 07:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 07:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 07:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 07:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-10 08:03 pm (UTC)This sweeping generalisation brought to you by the letter IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII