(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-21 11:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atothek.livejournal.com
Didn't he do Dark Angel?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-22 12:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] argonel.livejournal.com
I think so. I believe it is accurate to say it's his first theatrical sci-fi endeavor since terminator 2.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-22 12:17 am (UTC)
almostwitty: From the American Museum of Natural History, between 1901-1904.  https://nextshark.com/19th-century-photo-eating-rice (Default)
From: [personal profile] almostwitty
I went to a preview of 15 minutes of it earlier tonight - I'm not sure how "revolutionary" it is (yeah, sure, 60% of it is CGI, but it's still CGI of non-human characters) but the world looks incredibly lush and verdant. Worth catching.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-22 12:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
Argh... it looks very pretty, but the trailer makes it seem to be yet another "Empire vs. Ewoks" story.

-- Steve sees much hypocrisy in a super-high-tech CGI film declaiming the evils of technology.

PS: Please, Hollywood, let the "noble savage" myth die.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-22 12:05 pm (UTC)
ext_6388: Avon from Blake's 7 fails to show an emotion (Default)
From: [identity profile] fridgepunk.livejournal.com
to be fair there's probably a defense lab in some country that's trying to adapt that cybernetic remote-rat-controlling technology to create anti-air geese as I type this.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 02:02 am