It's That Time Of Year Again!
You run a zoo! Your head cloning scientist says she has two new baby velociraptors to show you. You fire her immediately for CLONING VELOCIRAPTORS, but you're still stuck with a few million dollars worth of baby animal that you can't necessarily afford to trash out of hand.
"Well", you think, "at least if they're all male, they can't breed with my *existing* population of 100%-male no-frog-DNA screw-you-Crichton velociraptors. Exactly 50% of all cloned velociraptor babies are male! Maybe I can keep them."
So you call your *new* head cloning scientist and ask *her* if at least one of the babies is male. She is briefly confused about the nature of your query, and then she has to bone up (no pun intended) on sex determination of infant cloned dinosaurs, but then she comes back and says "Yes! One of the babies is male!"
While this is technically the question you asked, this is not the answer you *wanted*. So, facing the loss of millions and losing your temper, you thank her and hang up so you can think.
And so, we reach your question: What are the odds that the second velociraptor is also male?
[EDIT: Your question was "is at least one male?". Her answer is "Yes! At least one is male!". This is not a trick based on the wording from your second-best cloning scientist.]
[EDIT2: Is is not a wording-based trick of any sort. You have two babies, each with a 50% chance of being male and a 50% chance of being female. One of the babies is male. What are the odds that the other baby is also male?]
You run a zoo! Your head cloning scientist says she has two new baby velociraptors to show you. You fire her immediately for CLONING VELOCIRAPTORS, but you're still stuck with a few million dollars worth of baby animal that you can't necessarily afford to trash out of hand.
"Well", you think, "at least if they're all male, they can't breed with my *existing* population of 100%-male no-frog-DNA screw-you-Crichton velociraptors. Exactly 50% of all cloned velociraptor babies are male! Maybe I can keep them."
So you call your *new* head cloning scientist and ask *her* if at least one of the babies is male. She is briefly confused about the nature of your query, and then she has to bone up (no pun intended) on sex determination of infant cloned dinosaurs, but then she comes back and says "Yes! One of the babies is male!"
While this is technically the question you asked, this is not the answer you *wanted*. So, facing the loss of millions and losing your temper, you thank her and hang up so you can think.
And so, we reach your question: What are the odds that the second velociraptor is also male?
[EDIT: Your question was "is at least one male?". Her answer is "Yes! At least one is male!". This is not a trick based on the wording from your second-best cloning scientist.]
[EDIT2: Is is not a wording-based trick of any sort. You have two babies, each with a 50% chance of being male and a 50% chance of being female. One of the babies is male. What are the odds that the other baby is also male?]
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 12:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 12:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 12:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 12:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 12:58 am (UTC)There are four scenarios, as follows:
Velociraptor Baby #1 (henceforth, VB1) is female, Velociraptor Baby #2 (henceforth, VB2) is female.
VB1 is male, VB2 is female.
VB1 is female, VB2 is male.
VB1 is male, VB2 is male.
From the data we have, we know the first scenario is impossible.
Therefore, the question becomes, of the three scenarios, how many have two males? Answer: one. Hence, 1/3, or 33%.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 12:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:00 am (UTC)I wouldn't even have said anything if John hadn't told me to.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:04 am (UTC)Are you *sure*?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:07 am (UTC)No, but I really don't care all that much anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:07 am (UTC)Then again, I somehow doubt that the point of the question is to laugh at people for accepting the premise.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:09 am (UTC)This also isn't the first time I've gotten it wrong.
And it isn't the first time I've felt like an idiot for not being able to figure it out.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:17 am (UTC)Cloning raptors was a mistake the first time, but you can't just destroy millions of dollars of R&D and immensely valuable live products. So you keep them and you hope your liability insurance accepts your disclaimers when the raptors get out, and you definitely don't let them breed.
And then your head scientist comes to you with "Hey, look, more raptors! I've made them BETTER!" Oh, fuck yes, you fire that person.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:17 am (UTC)(I'm not saying how, yet)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:19 am (UTC)0%. Exactly 50% of all cloned velociraptor babies are male. This is because there are only two cloned velociraptor babies in existence, they are in your lab, and only one is male.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:21 am (UTC)There's really not enough information to make a judgment as to probability here. I blame you, for choosing to write this in English.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:26 am (UTC)Great answer, but not what I intended. 50% of cloned velociraptor babies are male, by virtue of each cloned velociraptor having a 50/50 chance of being male/female.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-13 01:26 am (UTC)(More seriously: 50% of the output of your cloning effort are male, 50% female. IT IS MAGICAL.)