(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-22 05:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spondee.livejournal.com
This may be my favorite thing EVER!

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-22 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jaundicedaye.livejournal.com
No signal for ad hominem?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-22 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ambug666.livejournal.com
The signal for ad hominem:

One hand straight in front of you palm up but in a fist except for the middle finger pointed straight up.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-22 09:42 pm (UTC)
piemancer: (Default)
From: [personal profile] piemancer
Skkkt!

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-22 10:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kafziel.livejournal.com
No, but there should be one for falsely claiming ad hominem.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-22 11:33 pm (UTC)
maelorin: (understanding)
From: [personal profile] maelorin
^_^

though, to my mind, that signal makes more sense as "unconvincing attempt".

if signalled with both hands, "f*ck off, you did *not* just say that." or, in concise internet-speak, "hitler."

for ad hominem, perhaps: running forefinger along under nose, as if smelling it.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-22 11:33 pm (UTC)
maelorin: (abandoned rational thought)
From: [personal profile] maelorin
gold.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-23 12:04 am (UTC)
drcuriosity: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drcuriosity
Sorry, how is forefinger under nose not Hitler?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-23 11:03 am (UTC)
maelorin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] maelorin
holding it there, yes.

what i had in mind was moving the finger across the upper lip, as if smelling it ...

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 4th, 2026 06:35 pm