An answer to viewer feedback.
Mar. 28th, 2011 06:42 pmI have been asked, "So, did you LIKE Sucker Punch?"
And I must respond "both yes and no".
It did exactly what it said on the tin, delivering a very pretty experience with absolutely no redeeming factors outside the pretty.
It was, basically, an hour and a half-long music video.
As great MOVIES go, kinda crap.
As visual art experiences, it was decent-to-good.
In fact, if you watch Kanye West's "Power" video and think "Hmm, I might like 60 times as much of that, but with better music", you will probably like Sucker Punch. There's no characterisation or acting or story there. What there IS is a ton of impressively rendered fantasy action sequences.
I walked in expecting exactly that, and got my money's worth.
And I must respond "both yes and no".
It did exactly what it said on the tin, delivering a very pretty experience with absolutely no redeeming factors outside the pretty.
It was, basically, an hour and a half-long music video.
As great MOVIES go, kinda crap.
As visual art experiences, it was decent-to-good.
In fact, if you watch Kanye West's "Power" video and think "Hmm, I might like 60 times as much of that, but with better music", you will probably like Sucker Punch. There's no characterisation or acting or story there. What there IS is a ton of impressively rendered fantasy action sequences.
I walked in expecting exactly that, and got my money's worth.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-28 10:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-28 11:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 12:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 12:15 am (UTC)better or worse than 2001: a Space Odyssey?
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 12:28 am (UTC)What I can say, though, is that is not my kind of movie.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 01:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 01:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 01:30 am (UTC)You mean like "Queen of the Damned"?
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 10:01 am (UTC)Thing is, it's still not an INTERESTING story. It's simple, linear, utterly predictable, and short, and exists solely so they can hang action setpieces and T&A off it.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 11:03 am (UTC)But yeah, fun movie and I don't get the hate people seem to have for it. I do kind of want a video game or a graphic novel set in that crazy WW1.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 01:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 01:54 pm (UTC)It's a matter of "if you expected a film with an engaging narrative, you were completely in the wrong theatre entirely. Like going to see Heavy Metal expecting it to be a detective thriller or something".
The plot wasn't inchorent, or missing, or full of holes, or anything like that. It just wasn't *important*, so no effort was put in to make it interesting. Same with the characters.
The POINT of the movie was the action setpieces, so a bare minimum of everything else was presented in order to give them a frame to hang wonderfully rendered and elaborate fantasies on.
In fact? This move was *porn*, except with CGI fight scenes instead of fucking.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 01:57 pm (UTC)It still doesn't make the plot or characters interesting, but, again, I say that if you wanted plot or characters, you were in the wrong theatre *and all the advertising told you that well in advance*.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 07:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-29 09:39 pm (UTC)I enjoyed 300 for the shiny violence, didn't particularly enjoy WatchMen at all [film or books], and will go see this for the shiny violence.
that's it.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-30 01:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-30 05:30 am (UTC)