theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking
Yeah, kind of not a fan. Acceptably executed action movie, but really, REALLY racist. And classist. Not as misogynist as you'd expect from a DC product, but that's not exactly high praise or a difficult bar to clear.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-29 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
Hollywood can sometimes be worse than action movies in terms of misogyny. And I don't think this one passed the Bechdel Test even with two decent female characters. Couldn't just one of those CEO's bitching about profits have been a woman?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krystallnacht

Date: 2012-07-29 03:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] disgruntledgrrl.livejournal.com
I've heard from folks that the footage of the Jews being placed on the trains were well fed and well dressed while the screaming Germans on the side were obviously of a lower social run.
An old man told me "It was the rich against the poor and it was easy to push it."
"To justify it?" I asked
"No - never it was justified"

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-29 06:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] duskwuff.livejournal.com
Given that about 96% of Fortune 1000 CEOs are men (http://www.catalyst.org/publication/271/women-ceos-of-the-fortune-1000), I suspect that this aspect of the film's depiction of CEOs is more accurate than it is misogynist.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-30 07:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com
Not to be completely oblivious, but what racism?

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-30 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
that said, Wayne enterprises is intended to be a little more progressive. One wouldn't have hurt.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-30 01:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
yeah, I didn't really see a lot. I mean, there were a lot of white folks, but with the exception of maybe replacing Joseph Gordon Levitt with a non-white guy, I'm not sure where to go with it. Bane, maybe? But the bane in the comics is also white. Not that it should matter. And his mask made the matter of race sort of moot where he was concerned since half his face was covered.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-30 02:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com
I haven't read the comics, so I'm viewing the movie in isolation..

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-30 02:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Reproducing one of my comments from elsewhere:

All the heroes are white[1], or background characters who die before getting a line. The only non-white heroes are cops, who loyally serve the all-white cop leaders without speaking. All non-white people who speak are villains. Most brown-skinned people are Suspiciously Arab and wear Terrorist Garb and are Dangerous Savages. White people who are villains are shown to be brainwashed gullible idiots[2][3] who are only parroting the lines fed to them by the Suspiciously Arab characters and who go along with the Suspiciously Arab brainwashers because they are jealous of the success of rich (and thus morally superior) white men .


======================
Minor Spoilers in the footnotes
======================


[1]: Morgan Freeman is a token exception - but his role in this movie is to fail, to play into the villains plans, to fail again, and to give up, then fail. He is not permitted to accomplish anything. Lucius Fox's only purpose in this movie is to show that non-white people shouldn't bother TRYING to be heroes, it's not going to work because they're inherently incapable of it.

[2]: Exception: Bane, because only a white man is permitted to face Batman as an equal and present a challenge. And also, he is revealed in the end to be a brainwashed gullible idiot tricked by several Suspiciously Arab sorts.

[3]: Or parasites feeding the jealousies of the Useful Idiots for personal gain, cf The Scarecrow.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-30 06:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com
*blinks*

This is the first time I've heard anything that could be read as the suggestion that "action movies" are anything other than a subgenre of "Hollywood".[1]

Do you mean action movies are part of Hollywood that is sometimes out-misogynized[2] by the rest of Hollywood, or that action movies are different from Hollywood, and if the latter then how?
---
[1] I will note that while places which are not Hollywood do turn out action movies, when I hear about those in North American media, they tend to be prefaced with an adjective indicating where they were made.
[2] Somehow "better" sounds inaccurate, and if I'm going to get wordy, this shall be my word.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-31 08:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dscotton.livejournal.com
Your complaints seem kind of absurd to me. "Only" one black hero (out of eight major characters) is representative of US demographics. And of course he failed, this is a Batman movie, which means Batman is the guy who's going to save the day. That much should have been obvious before watching the movie. It's not like he was incompetent, he supplied Batman with cool new equipment (which falls in his department), he just failed at stopping the bomb (which doesn't).

Bane was brainwashed by Arab sorts? Admittedly I couldn't understand most of what he was saying but I thought he was just following Marion Cotillard (French) who was enacting the plan of her dad Liam Neeson (Irish).

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-31 01:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
The only black character to speak, who doesn't just provide Batman with cool new equipment, he provides Batman with malfunctioning new equipment[1] that Batman has to fix and also provides Bane with all kinds of cool new equipment through incompetence, and also gives Bane the bomb, and also fails to stop the bomb.

This isn't just "nobody but Batman can solve the problem", that's a red herring. Robin and Catwoman and Gordon don't solve the problem, either, but they also don't automatically fail and/or help the enemy at every turn. They produce useful results and accomplish important things. Fox, on the other hand, is shown to be completely incompetent at running Wayne Enterprises without Bruce Wayne and equally incompetent at maintaining, improving, or repairing the equipment he has "inherited". Hey wait, "the black man creates nothing, and only destroys things that white men have built even when he tries not to - he can't help it", where have I seen that before?

Bane was brainwashed by Arab sorts? Admittedly I couldn't understand most of what he was saying but I thought he was just following Marion Cotillard (French) who was enacting the plan of her dad Liam Neeson (Irish).

Marion Cotillard's darkened-for-film skin[2] and wandering middle-eastern accent pegged her as Suspiciously Foreign from scene 1. And while Neeson the actor is white, Ra's al Ghul, the character he is playing, most definitely is not. And that's not just a "comics intruding" thing, that's "he's a middle-eastern terrorist whose name is pointed out on-screen as being Arabic" - and all the rest of the League Of Shadows and the occupants of the prison are wearing keffiyeh (and waving guns, for the League) while trying to rape and kill (the prisoners) or while they're plotting the downfall of America (the League).

The League Of Shadows are unsubtly, to the point of hamfistedness, painted as "arab=terrorist=evil" and as a cartoon terrorist cell of happily suicidal sorts.


This movie is *stuffed to the gills* with racist stereotypes[3]. Some of that is from the source material and a lot of the rest is, I suspect, unconscious, but it's THERE. (And it would have been possible to just NOT go to the lazy shorthand and pander to stupidity, but then it wouldn't have been DC.)


[1]: That, this time, he didn't make, didn't design, didn't create - he just took it from the actual inventors and put it in a warehouse. Which is an extra side attack on Fox that I missed at the time.

[2]: To the point where, not knowing the actress, I thought she actually was middle-eastern, not just in brownface for the film.

[3]: And also poverty stereotypes. Let it never be said that the movie is ONLY racist, because wow I haven't seen depictions of the poor that.... nuanced.... since Prince Of Darkness and their establishment-as-fact that homeless people are literally a lower form of life, closer to insect than human in a very physical way that makes Satan's mind control work better on them.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-31 04:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com
*quietly suggests that perhaps when Ra's al Ghul is established to be the Arabic character who heads the organization located in South Asia, and when his child is born and raised in an Arabic location (specifically within the Magreb, if you get into the dialect used in the pit), there is some precedent for considering Ra's al Ghul and Talia to be Arabic characters*

I mean, no-one is going around calling Batman "that Welsh superhero", regardless of where Bale was born.

ETA: It might be interesting if they did. "Look! The Americans need to be saved by the noble foreigner, who successfully navigates their business world and is only brought down because he is self-sacrificing and then underhandedly attacked. It is kind of a shame that the only thing the movie thought was worth showing about generic non-rich Americans who aren't cops is how they quickly react to a terrorist invasion by forming a kangaroo court to support the invaders and gunning down police officers in the streets, but at least the noble Welshman (with his staunch but elderly British assistants, the butler and the bobby) is there to save them after they have been manipulated by the cunning European and Irish! (It's a redemption thing, you see. Those cunning bastards even managed to get an Englishman to follow them, so of course the Americans never really had a chance.)"

"And there are some nice Americans. The young pretty ones who manage to be useful. A bit. After instruction on how to behave from the savvy people of the United Kingdom. And the old one gives the noble Welshman an almost-built enough toy that he only has to do the smart person work, which is good! Because that damn old Yank then looses all the toys to the cunning terrorists, thank god for the Welshman being able to salvage things."

*amused*
Edited Date: 2012-07-31 05:19 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-31 06:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glenn-3.livejournal.com
On [1]: Fox was the Applied Sciences department in Batman Begins. And I don't think Wayne Enterprises did military contracts after Batman Begins, so all those devices in the Armory probably were Fox's work. That doesn't change or challenge your overall point, of course.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-07-31 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Applying that conceit to other movies is interesting, too. The Hunt For Red October becomes about a noble Scotsman stealing nuclear missiles from British perverts to give to Americans.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-08-01 01:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com
Agreed, in my understanding, on both counts. ...and now that you point it out, I'm annoyed. We got none of the "amazing but too expensive to win military contracts" stuff from Batman Begins, we just got "man who cannot prevent absentee boss from ruining company tinkers up airplane missing an essential element." Augh.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-08-01 02:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dscotton.livejournal.com
Your complaints seem kind of absurd to me. "Only" one black hero (out of eight major characters) is representative of US demographics. And of course he failed, this is a Batman movie, which means Batman is the guy who's going to save the day. That much should have been obvious before watching the movie. It's not like he was incompetent, he supplied Batman with cool new equipment (which falls in his department), he just failed at stopping the bomb (which doesn't).

Bane was brainwashed by Arab sorts? Admittedly I couldn't understand most of what he was saying but I thought he was just following Marion Cotillard (French) who was enacting the plan of her dad Liam Neeson (Irish).

(no subject)

Date: 2012-08-01 06:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glenn-3.livejournal.com
Actually, until the end, I thought Fox was lying about the Bat having an autopilot at all. Especially after his line, "Autopilot? That's what you're for." Like the autopilot was supposed to be a joke. I was that sure that Fox wouldn't be relying on Wayne to fix anything he'd built. Because the Wayne in these movies was never shown to have any mechanical aptitude.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 2nd, 2026 01:24 pm