Wow, I really don't understand the point of that argument that Moen is making there. Yes, maybe, possibly, you could argue that what Vox Anus was saying in that one instance was a hypothetical, intended ironically, but why would you? Vox Anus is not, himself, ever in good faith about anything, certainly not in his readings of others. Smearing Vox Anus in any way possible seems to me not just justifiable but an imperative.
Besides, we all know Vox Anus is in perfect dead earnest. To the extent he means anything, he means that. He's hypothesizing on the square. Imagining the cloak of irony around that remark represents his views - i.e. that he doesn't really fantasize about murdering women in horrible ways to achieve his desired social ends - requires one to ignore the cumulative weight of everything he's ever said on the subject.
Also, if PZ Myers is the asshole and Vox Anus is the victim, I have to wonder if that whole paragraph is an intrusion from bizarro world. It's imbecilic.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-05-04 02:35 am (UTC)Besides, we all know Vox Anus is in perfect dead earnest. To the extent he means anything, he means that. He's hypothesizing on the square. Imagining the cloak of irony around that remark represents his views - i.e. that he doesn't really fantasize about murdering women in horrible ways to achieve his desired social ends - requires one to ignore the cumulative weight of everything he's ever said on the subject.
Also, if PZ Myers is the asshole and Vox Anus is the victim, I have to wonder if that whole paragraph is an intrusion from bizarro world. It's imbecilic.