(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-23 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com
I thought you didn't like furries?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-23 05:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Furries annoy the living shit out of me.

Anthropomorphic art can be just fine. It's just usually associated with brain-damaged indiscriminate "my spirit animal is ANYTHING CUTE oh god dogs is teh SEX4Y" types.

In a word: "yiff".

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-23 05:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com
Ah.

I know a lot of furries who agree with you :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-23 05:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
If they agree with me, they probably don't fit the definition of "furry".

(In the same way, there are people who play roleplaying games, and then there are gamers. There are people who like comic books, and then there are comic book geeks. There are people who watch Star Trek, and then there are the filthy, unwashed Trekkie hordes.)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-23 05:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com
Some of them self identiy as furries though. Most who don't fit that definition would call themselves furs though.

I've had this basic discussion many times at star trek conventions :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-24 03:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com
In other words, most people who can be categorized by a single two-syllable word have insufficient hygiene and drive you mad with their apparent stupidity?

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 2nd, 2026 03:10 pm