(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-29 05:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rimrunner.livejournal.com
all possession of the Catholic Church are available to be liquidated to pay off lawsuits

I've always wanted to live in a church. Or a lighthouse, possibly. (There are a number of lighthouses in the U.S. that you can buy from the government as long as you agree to maintain them. They're expensive, though.)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-30 11:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] corruptedjasper.livejournal.com
Churches can be good, but you really have to treat them as an empty shell most of the time and completely refurbish with insulated windows and roof before it even gets mildly reasonable to live in them, at least if they're the older kind that looks cool -- newer modern churches just ar fugly. I've always liked the abandoned missile silo thing, myself. They're under a million bucks completely refurbished into a spectacular home, *and* your entire house is inside a nuke shelter.

I wonder how long before most churches around reform into priests being employees with a salary, rather than one big organisation, the individual people of which cannot be held individually liable.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-29 06:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
I think that saying that all the assets of the Catholic Church being available to pay lawsuits against the Church or particular priests is a fucking great idea.
That man should get a medal.
Why? In rigidly heirarchial systems, such as what the Catholic Church uses, the actions of subordinates are the responsibility of superiors. When you assume a position of absolute or near-absolute authority over somebody, you ethically assume a position of absolute or near-absolute responsibility for the actions of that person.
Take the fuckin' money they've wasted on ostentious cathedrals and put it to the uses that their own holy book says it should be put.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-29 07:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toku666.livejournal.com
Wouldn't one jellyfish in a nuclear plant's coolant system be abnormal?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-29 08:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Not when you're pumping in the Baltic Sea as "coolant".

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-30 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] corruptedjasper.livejournal.com
This is the secondary coolant system, not the primary. Well, actually, it's probably the tertiary system, but anyway it's not the stuff that directly cools the reactor core.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-30 08:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toku666.livejournal.com
Yeah, I'm pretty sure I'm more or less completely ignorant about the precise workings of nuclear power plants.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 09:27 am