(no subject)
Oct. 4th, 2005 07:54 pmRepublicans in Indiana are trying to pass a law that will make marriage and a court-granted certificate a requirement for motherhood if any kind of "reproductive aid" is used - and make it a crime to reproduce without this certificate and a legal marriage, and require that the married couple be exclusively the legal parents of the child, in perpetuity.
Draft of the law here.
While I'm at it, other Republicans are trying to abolish habeas corpus for the express stated purpose of denying appeals and making sure more (innocent, since they're released on appeal) people get the death penalty.
Once again:

Draft of the law here.
While I'm at it, other Republicans are trying to abolish habeas corpus for the express stated purpose of denying appeals and making sure more (innocent, since they're released on appeal) people get the death penalty.
Once again:

(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 12:40 am (UTC)Anybody else see the blatant "We don't want those dirty lezzies having babies"?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 12:50 am (UTC)What am I talking about? When did the Constitution start mattering?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 11:30 am (UTC)Mind, I've been known to remark that people ought to be required to have a license to breed, but my criteria for said license DO NOT include "het, married and religious", as those are all completely irrelevant to the task of parenting.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 01:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 03:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 05:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 02:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 03:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 12:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 06:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 01:45 am (UTC)Sometimes I wonder if they're ahead of schedule. Doesn't authoritarianism like this require a few more steps?