(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 12:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] missysedai.livejournal.com
They're claiming that it's to help enforce the surrogacy ban? My bullshit mete just BROKE.

Anybody else see the blatant "We don't want those dirty lezzies having babies"?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 12:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
I see it. Well, Indiana will lose its intelligent lesbian population ... or they'll go out-of-state to get impregnated ... wait ... would that fall under the commerce clause of the Consitution?
What am I talking about? When did the Constitution start mattering?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 11:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] missysedai.livejournal.com
Heh. It stopped mattering a while ago.

Mind, I've been known to remark that people ought to be required to have a license to breed, but my criteria for said license DO NOT include "het, married and religious", as those are all completely irrelevant to the task of parenting.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
My criteria would be "financially and emotionally stable".

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] missysedai.livejournal.com
Those, plus "educated". They don't have to be geniuses, but it would be nice if they could at least read, write and speak properly. Perpetuating teh st00pid is not a good thing.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 03:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
Well, I think we ought to be teaching critical thinking (informal logic) starting in elementary school ... and formal logic starting when we now start teaching geometry or algebra. Of course, I wouldn't want only classical logic to be taught, since I expressly deny the validity of non-relevant logics, but it is pedagogically simpler and it shouldn't be too hard to divorce people from it's absurd consequences (it's also possible to just say "this is classical logic; not all logicians think it's the best logic around; here are some resources to look into if you want to explore that") ... at least if they're not rigidly dogmatic thinkers.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 05:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pope-guilty.livejournal.com
I live in Indiana. Our intelligent lesbian population is nothing more than a courtesy delegation.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 02:54 pm (UTC)
ext_12920: (Default)
From: [identity profile] desdenova.livejournal.com
I'm wondering what the penalty for "unauthorized reproduction" is? State-enforced abortion? I doubt it. A fine? Voiding of parental rights?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 03:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
It's a Class B Misdemeanor. Those have a standard punishment.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 03:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
I'm taking "class b" as the same thing as "class 2", so here's the standard maximum punishment for that: For Class 2 misdemeanors, confinement in jail for up to six months and a fine of up to $1,000, either or both.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 12:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
[livejournal.com profile] pseudomanitou said that it's sad that the Nazi's record on the treatment of POWs (maybe not the people from their controlled areas) is better than the current DoD.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 06:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] culfinriel.livejournal.com
Um, I'd examine that a little more closely. The Nazis treated some POWs per the Geneva convention but not all. There were some egregious abuses. They were deliberately selective about it, too.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-05 01:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sivi-volk.livejournal.com
*blink*

Sometimes I wonder if they're ahead of schedule. Doesn't authoritarianism like this require a few more steps?

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 07:02 am