(no subject)

[theweaselking]

"Why being into cats is essentially the same as being into psychotic tweakers."

Despite the awesomeness of the comparison, I disagree. Psychotic tweakers aren't cute, fuzzy, affectionate in a good way, and small enough for me to throw out the window with one hand should I feel the need to.

I must admit, though - if they were, I might keep one as a pet.

Comments

[unnamed525.livejournal.com]

Psychotic tweakers could be cute and fuzzy ... if they didn't shave, I guess.

[cmseward.livejournal.com]

And had pupils the size of nickels.

[rimrunner.livejournal.com]

OMG I can't stop laughing.

Mr. Darcy needs to see this.

[lurkerwithout.livejournal.com]

Cats can't pawn your stereo for speed. Though they ARE both capable of filling a room with some horrible stench...

Having lived with both, the advantage goes to...CATS!

[harald387.livejournal.com]

See, keeping small furry animals in one's home is a clear indication of BRAIN DISEASE.

-K

[eididdy.livejournal.com]

"affectionate in a good way"

Hmm, so your idea of "affectionate" is "be there when I want some affection and fuck off when you want some" eh?

Stupid cats...

[torrain.livejournal.com]

Also "be small enough to pick up and demand attention from when I want some, and to evict if I don't".

[eididdy.livejournal.com]

Wait, does that also include "have the shit scratched out of you when you pick me up and demand attention that I don't feel like giving you" too?

[theweaselking.livejournal.com]

Mine don't do that.

And, unlike dogs, they're known for their ability to poop without assistance or a need for me to open the door for them.

So there.

Neener neener neener.

[torrain.livejournal.com]

Never in my experience.

Perhaps you've been dealing with tweakers *disguised* as cats.