(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-24 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
One, and I quote: Except for any refund elected by Microsoft, YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, if the Software does not meet Microsoft's Limited Warranty, and, to the maximum extent allowed by applicable law, even if any remedy fails of its essential purpose. ... so ... there's really no limited warranty at all, at least not in any meaningful sense. What they're saying is, "We've said this program won't fuck up royally, but if it does, too damn bad for you."

Two, that last picture is beyond wrong.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-24 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thathatedguy.livejournal.com
OK, the baby squirrels have disturbed me more than any single image that you've ever posted. Are you happy? Huh? Are you!?!?!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-24 09:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
... and I don't know about him, but I'm taking some vicarious pleasure over that since you're the man who first tubgirled me.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-24 07:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catlin.livejournal.com
that is so wrong, poor poor little critter

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-26 12:14 am (UTC)
frith: (fawn)
From: [personal profile] frith
The situation illustrated in the last photo is a common problem in hand-reared squirrels. One common remedy is to smear tree-tea oil on the tempting protuberance. I suspect abnormal suckling may be indicative of a nutritional shortcoming, such as too few nursing bouts. I cannot speak with authority as I am only experienced with deer and none of my fawns ever suckled uro-genital naughty bits.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 07:02 am