(no subject)

[theweaselking]

Rape victim spends three frantic days trying to find *SOMEBODY* in Tucson, AZ who will dispense contraceptive drugs without refusing on the "moral grounds" that filthy sluts like her deserve what they get for having sex.

A portrait of Patrick Fitzgerald and The Top Nine Plamegate Lies

Hey, look, ultra-right-wingers participating in *voluntary* socialised medicine because it's the only thing that works. Of course, being far-right loonies, they're doing it without insurance regulation, privacy guarantees, knowing where the money goes, or any guarantee of actual support. The "doctors" approving the care and offering alternate suggestions don't have licenses to practice medicine. Oh, and them damn dirty fags need not apply.

Comments

[kali-kali.livejournal.com]

If it's voluntary socialized medicine, what's the issue? If people choose to enroll in something like that, that is their business.

[theweaselking.livejournal.com]

Perhaps you missed the inherent hypocrisy in the "socialism in all forms is EEEEEVIL" crowd signing up for socialised medicine. I will highlight that for your benefit - like, say, this, and the previous sentence.

And then, of course, they're screwing it up, because they're idiots, and then failing to notice how a regulated and accountable version of that that included everyone would, in fact, be cheaper.

[harald387.livejournal.com]

I have a feeling their thinking goes something like this:

"Socialized medicine isn't a bad thing! Everyone should have the benefit of medical care!

Unless you're black. Or poor, of course. Or one of those islamic terrorists. Or a fucking kike, get away from me. And don't even try to get in if you're a filthy dirty faggot, we might just shoot you and make the world a better place."

Social programs are just fine with the right wing, as long as they benefit the right people.

Makes me sick.

-K

[kali-kali.livejournal.com]

The issue is choice. Why is that so difficult to comprehend? People should be free to join groups as they choose without coercion, free to leave groups as they choose without coercion, feel free to leave out whoever they want, as long as they a) don't receive state funding, and b) stick to themselves (that is, they can feel free to exclude any group they want, but they can't be infringing on that group's lives and space).

[theweaselking.livejournal.com]

This is not about free association.

There are three funny things here:
#1: Hypocrisy.
#2: Incompetence.
#3: Ignorance.

(And your section "B" invariably leads to segregation - but, then, you're the one who thinks that "White power! White culture! Up the White Nation!" and all its' corollaries for other groups aren't racist, so it's not surprising.)