(no subject)
Dec. 12th, 2005 08:59 amHow To Make Communion Wafers Taste Better: A study in condimentation.
Also,
Worst Analogies Ever
Also,
FEMA: They'll pay you back if you can afford all the expenses out of pocket yourself, but if you don't have the money to begin with, fuck you. You're poor.
Also,

Also,
Worst Analogies Ever
Also,
FEMA: They'll pay you back if you can afford all the expenses out of pocket yourself, but if you don't have the money to begin with, fuck you. You're poor.
A FEMA program to reimburse applicants for generators and storm cleanup items has benefited middle- and upper-income Floridians the most and has so far cost taxpayers more than $332 million for the past two hurricane seasons, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel found in a continuing investigation of disaster aid.
By agreement with the state, which pays 25 percent of the cost, FEMA reimburses for generators, chain saws, dehumidifiers, air purifiers, and wet-dry vacuums purchased for home use after a disaster.
For the four Florida hurricanes in 2004, the reimbursements amounted to $242 million. Eighty percent of the money went to applicants in middle- and upper-income areas.
"It's absolutely disgusting," said David Bronstein, an insurance fraud lawyer in Plantation. Bronstein put in a claim for a generator he bought when his Davie home lost electricity from Wilma. He said he "makes six figures" and could ''certainly afford my own." Bronstein was surprised that he qualified but more surprised when his government check arrived for $836, the maximum amount. He paid $562, including tax.
When Wilma knocked out power to Debbie Springston's Fort Lauderdale home, she begged FEMA for a generator for her son Marcus, 18, who was born with heart and kidney ailments. "FEMA said, 'Go buy a generator' and they'll reimburse us for it, but we didn't have money," she said. Marcus uses catheters several times a day to remove bodily wastes. With no electricity, he performed the task using light from a battery-operated lamp and, when that failed, some small candles. After a week, the family moved to a motel paid for by their homeowner's insurance.
Also,

(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 02:08 pm (UTC)But...
Okay, even *I* know that makes no sense. What the hell are they doing, living in some fluffy never-never land where everyone has a credit card or a relative who'll suck up your bills for you, and only bad people can't afford to buy things on credit?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 02:30 pm (UTC)If you're poor, it's because you're MORALLY INFERIOR. If you don't have a credit rating, it's because you're LAZY. If your 5-year-old kid breaks his leg, your insurance doesn't cover it, and you have to go on one meal a day for a few months to be able to afford basic care that won't leave him crippled for life? You deserve it, for chosing to be poor. You got fired because they needed to increase the CEO's salary again and poor people in Bangalore will do your job in hellish conditions with no oversight laws for $0.02 per day, and be thankful? That's your fault. You *could* have been a billionaire business pirate, too, if you'd just worked a little harder.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 02:40 pm (UTC)Just so you know.
(I should probably do it anyway, though. It might be a decent workout, and it's not like I should have to wait for someone to be a fucking moron within earshot to get around to that.)
(Did I mention I ran into one of the other students from the Thai Boxing Academy when I was out present-shopping yesterday?)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 02:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 02:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 02:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 03:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 03:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 03:16 pm (UTC)I wish I had a copy of the letter he sent out containing those statments. it'd be interesting to see what passes for anti-christian in kansas.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 03:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 03:56 pm (UTC)I honestly expect most of the people singing the praises of the free market would change their tune if it bit them on the ass[1]; meantime, I just get annoyed when I get to hear them.
---
[1] The alternatives being to take it as an indication of personal moral failure or ignore it completely.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 04:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 05:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 06:19 pm (UTC)Oh well.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 06:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 06:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 06:26 pm (UTC)I'm more convinced that the submitters and the jury didn't get half of those.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 06:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 06:53 pm (UTC)And no.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-12 07:09 pm (UTC)I did, actually. But on purpose, is all I'm saying.
The "high school essay" title implies that the writers were not aware of how hilariously awful the analogies were, but that's not the case. Which makes a different kind of hilarious, IMO.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-13 04:17 am (UTC)