theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking


People keep asking me to cut my pictures today.

Well, I'm not cutting this one.

So there.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-12 09:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
This kind of nature porn is not work-safe. Please hide it in a cut.

(Vermont, yes?)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-12 09:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
No idea.

And if this is not work-safe, then I hate your job and think you should get fired.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-12 09:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vagabond27.livejournal.com
I CUT YOU MANG!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-12 10:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fortysevenbteg.livejournal.com
I absolutely love this kind of scene. *shivers*

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-12 10:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] texas-tiger.livejournal.com
cuting: v. to cute

So, you may not have *cut* it, but you *did* cute it.

GD&R

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-12 11:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Hah! Fixed it 10 minutes before the kibitzing!

So there.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-13 12:28 am (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
Um, you've never cut picture that are safe that I recall, why people asking now?

Not that I actually care, I've set LJ to not display above 640*something unless I read the post itself, it saves the dial up death o doom.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-13 12:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I'm not seriously upset. It was the dogfight (cut because, well, it's two dogs fighting, and one of them is bleeding all over the place) and the Giant Hasselhoff, which appears to sear the eyes of the unbeliever.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-13 12:38 am (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
See, Hoff I understand, the less seen of him the better, and I guess the dogfight makes sense, I didn't click it.

But nature pics? If I had broadband I wouldn't have a problem at all.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-13 01:40 pm (UTC)
fearmeforiampink: (Default)
From: [personal profile] fearmeforiampink
My general position on it is that you should look at the person's LJ if you're worried about cutting. If people post large images/amounts of text frequently and never cut it, then that's fine cause you can choose to have them on your friends list or not, or indeed filter them for when you've got the bandwidth to view them.

It's mostly only annoying when someone who generally does small posts and few images suddenly posts a dozen huge pictures.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-13 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Nobody was complaining about the bandwidth, or the nature pics.

The ones people complained about, somewhat justifiably, where the work-safe but somewhat graphic dogfight and the work-safe but somewhat creepy 13-foot Hasselhoff.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 5th, 2026 12:27 pm