I object! None of those are ugly. The first one is weird yes (okay, the second one could be counted as weird if you saw it in real life, but not especially weird-looking off-hand), but not ugly.
The last one wins an award and a place in my campeign if I can swing it.
Query, however: obviously there's a white tiger in there, but while my subconcious is also saying "must be polar bear as well if it's Ugly Zoo", damned if I can actually spot anything that ISN'T tigery. Was the tiger subbed in whole cloth? That doesn't look like a diving pose for either species, and the tiger has "ring lights" in its eyes that say it was on a professional set when the photo was taken.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-09 03:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-09 04:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-09 04:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-09 11:49 am (UTC)Query, however: obviously there's a white tiger in there, but while my subconcious is also saying "must be polar bear as well if it's Ugly Zoo", damned if I can actually spot anything that ISN'T tigery. Was the tiger subbed in whole cloth?
That doesn't look like a diving pose for either species, and the tiger has "ring lights" in its eyes that say it was on a professional set when the photo was taken.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-09 12:12 pm (UTC)I think it's just a tiger diving into the water in a zoo going after something thrown to the bottom. It's not unheard-of behaviour.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-10 08:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-11 02:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-09 06:23 pm (UTC)