(no subject)
Oct. 7th, 2004 11:49 amStealing from Mike Hoye:
This is what a Michigan ballot looks like.
This is what a Florida ballot looked like last election.
Mike says: "Insanity. Deliberate and verging on malicious."
I says: Check out the Presidential election printing. This looks like a machine-read ballot. Notice how there's no way to mark Bush directly - but, just looking at that, if you want to mark Kerry, you punch the button beside Kerry without examining the rest in detail - which votes for Bush. If you want to vote Bush, you notice that it's displaced by one, and you vote for Bush.
Oh, of COURSE this is just an accidental misprinting, in a swing state coming from *that* bunch of Republicans.
Also stealing from Mike, this is an Elections Canada standard ballot.
This is what a Michigan ballot looks like.
This is what a Florida ballot looked like last election.
Mike says: "Insanity. Deliberate and verging on malicious."
I says: Check out the Presidential election printing. This looks like a machine-read ballot. Notice how there's no way to mark Bush directly - but, just looking at that, if you want to mark Kerry, you punch the button beside Kerry without examining the rest in detail - which votes for Bush. If you want to vote Bush, you notice that it's displaced by one, and you vote for Bush.
Oh, of COURSE this is just an accidental misprinting, in a swing state coming from *that* bunch of Republicans.
Also stealing from Mike, this is an Elections Canada standard ballot.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 09:07 am (UTC)Are absentee ballots generally different in appearance?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 11:31 am (UTC)If, however, absentee ballots are standardised amongst all states and counted differently, they might look completely different. Did you have all those votes, with all the same names?
I supposed you've already filled in yours and mailed it off, so you can't exactly scan a copy.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 11:43 am (UTC)Voting in this country is insane: it's handled on a county-by-county basis, and sometimes on a precinct-by-precisct basis.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 11:59 am (UTC)What's worrying me, really, are the voter registration practices of the USA. You can register anywhere, and they *ask* you, on the *honour system*, while stating that they *cannot* check for certain, to give them anywhere you've been registered before so they can take you off the list there.
In short, you can register in every place that uses a different voter's list, and you'll never be caught unless people manually compare the lists - and nobody running the election does so.
Come ON, people. Computerisation! Communication! ONE SINGLE NAITONAL VOTER REGISTRY. You've got bloody unique Social Security ID numbers, USE 'EM FOR SOMETHING.
Sheesh.
As much as I mock Americans for living in a technological backwater and being 20 years behind the times in daily life, it always shocks me to see how true it is.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 11:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 11:53 am (UTC)If it's counting *a lack of black ink*, it will mark all votes as being for Bush in addition to any actual other votes, and if it's programmed *to use this ballot*, it will count all votes for Kerry for Bush, and all Green party votes for Kerry, and all votes for Bush either for Bush (because they noticed the misprint) or not at all (if they punch out the bit beside Bush's name)
Now I'd *really* like to see what the Armed Forces Absentee ballots look like.