(no subject)
Mar. 7th, 2006 09:28 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
theweaselkingIn a decision that could reopen hundreds of criminal cases, the California Supreme Court on Monday struck down a state law that forced adults who had voluntary oral sex with older teenagers to register for life as sex offenders.
In a 6-1 decision, the court said the law violated equal protection guarantees because offenders who had oral sex must register but those who had sexual intercourse are not required to register.
iocaste212's comment is perfect: "Frankly, I think you should be punished if you have intercourse without oral sex"
In a 6-1 decision, the court said the law violated equal protection guarantees because offenders who had oral sex must register but those who had sexual intercourse are not required to register.
iocaste212's comment is perfect: "Frankly, I think you should be punished if you have intercourse without oral sex"