(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-23 10:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ed-dirt.livejournal.com
hey man...not my business, but you didn't link Macmillan's comic to her site.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-23 10:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I found it from somebody else who didn't link it, and I didn't know the author or the source.

Of course, as soon as you mention it, I look closer at the image and see the URL. It's linked now, thanks.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-23 11:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ed-dirt.livejournal.com
sorry, I shoulda told you where it was from. I thought you found it on her site, but after seeing it hotlinked all over the net, i realize that you got it somewhere else and didn't know.
her lj is [livejournal.com profile] mcmillan btw (I misspelt it above).

thanks for linking it properly.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-24 04:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
This is a lot like those people who pick up a cigarrete someone throws down on the ground and says "Excuse me, I think you accidentally dropped this."

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-24 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Not really. More comparable would be "pointing out that I'd tossed my butt at the garbage, and it bounced off and onto the ground when I wasn't looking"

In my opinion, anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-24 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ed-dirt.livejournal.com
WHAAAAAT?

what the hell are you talking about?!?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-24 06:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
I'm saying: attribution demands on personal blogs are about as annoying as what I just described.

Luckily for you, it didn't actually bother the person that is important here...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-24 06:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Failing to attribute is impolite. I try to avoid doing it. In cases where I don't do it, it's most often because I don't know the source or I've screwed up my HTML and the link is both hidden and broken.

In this case? I didn't know the source, because I didn't read the extremely small print closely enough, so I appreciate a mention of where to go.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-24 06:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ed-dirt.livejournal.com
Dude, this isn't about someone not giving credit for where they found the material. It's not about a failure to "Ganked from" or "Swiped from" or "snagged from"

What I was talking about is copyrighted material that was being hotlinked off the author's site with no aknowledgment as regards the source. Yes, there is actually a reference to the source ON the strip itself, but it's muddy and tiny and all but illegible.

I realize that this is a personal blog, but it's widely read and since [livejournal.com profile] theweaselking links to the other cool shit he finds I thought it was only fair that this get spotted. It's by these little boosts that webcomics build up a readership.

Luckily for [livejournal.com profile] mcmillan, [livejournal.com profile] theweaselking is cool enough to have rectified the situation.

As for my lucky as in "Luckily for me", again i say

whaaaat? what the hell are you talking about?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-24 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Actually, it is not and was never being linked from the original site. It's being pulled from a Photobucket account that has no relation to the author - that's why I couldn't just follow that back to the source in the first place.

If it were being hotlinked from the author's site, it would have been much easier to put a backtracking link.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-24 09:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
It's pedantic. But meh. You're clearly "one of those types", and while normally I'd shudder to deal with you, I don't have to. Have a good day.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-24 09:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I think you're being a little oversensitive, Ken. Really.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-23 02:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com
Are those phone numbers accurate?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-23 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
According to the author's site (which I found through Matt's prompting, above), yes, they are, taken from his Senate website.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-23 04:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rimrunner.livejournal.com
I love that first one. I should call and ask him what I should have for lunch today.

The Post's conclusion is clear: we should use slot machines to cast ballots in the next election.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-23 05:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] culfinriel.livejournal.com
1. I love the cartoon. I hope he gets a LOT of phone calls.
2. So much for rehabbing Torquemada's image.
3. Elections would be much cheaper if we just flipped a coin. It would also relieve us of stupid campaigns.
4. Sad as this is, I think the Texas thing the is least offensive issue here.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 4th, 2026 10:20 pm