theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking




Before you ask, yes, yes it is fake. That's hardly standard advertising copy.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-03 06:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sivi-volk.livejournal.com
a) Wrong.

b) I'm somewhat concerned that somebody owns those pictures in order to fake the advert.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-03 11:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] corruptedjasper.livejournal.com
Looks like it might well be the same girl twice. Athletics leads to some strange poses.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-04 02:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sivi-volk.livejournal.com
Yes, but the photograph has to be either owned by the person who took it, which is disturbing, or found by someone, who subsequently modified it, which is almost as disturbing.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 6th, 2026 05:30 am