(no subject)
Nov. 2nd, 2004 09:08 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
theweaselkingHigher court overturns previous ruling on "bring down the vote" tactics in Ohio
Only one challenger per side per polling place, though, and as of 6:30 AM, the Democrat challengers were in place and telling reporters openly and frankly that they did not intend to do anything except make sure that nobody got challenged unfairly.
The use of challengers was previously ruled unconstitutional, because the challenge cannot be appealed until after the election, and a challenge would cost the challenged person their vote regardless of legality.
Only one challenger per side per polling place, though, and as of 6:30 AM, the Democrat challengers were in place and telling reporters openly and frankly that they did not intend to do anything except make sure that nobody got challenged unfairly.
The use of challengers was previously ruled unconstitutional, because the challenge cannot be appealed until after the election, and a challenge would cost the challenged person their vote regardless of legality.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-02 08:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-02 09:18 am (UTC)That might have been fun.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-02 12:28 pm (UTC)