![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
theweaselkingBaltimore City police have a new crime on the books: Stealing your own car.
Just ask Keith Spence, a Baltimore City resident who was arrested when he was driving home from work in a car he bought with a tax refund.
Spence, 28, said city police pulled him over in his 1993 red Cadillac Elderado coupe for a cracked rear window in February. Four officers dragged Spence and his two passengers from the car and said they were under arrest for stealing it, he said.
“I tried to tell them it was my car, but they wouldn’t listen.”
Spence and his two friends were arrested, and the car was impounded. Charged with one count of motor vehicle theft, Spence represented himself in court in June.
“I owned the car — I knew it wasn’t stolen,” he said. Even though Spence had the title proving he owned the car, he said he was cleared of the charges because of the testimony of the owner of the stolen car. “The whole courtroom fell out — even the judge laughed,” Spence told The Examiner.
Still, police sold Spence’s car at auction two months before his day in court.
[Spence's lawyer] said the case also points out problems with the city’s management of stolen vehicles. “You have to question why a stolen car would be sold at all,” he said.
Police spokesman Matt Jablow said police are investigating the incident.
Spence said he only wants the Cadillac he worked so hard to buy.
“I loved that car.”
Just ask Keith Spence, a Baltimore City resident who was arrested when he was driving home from work in a car he bought with a tax refund.
Spence, 28, said city police pulled him over in his 1993 red Cadillac Elderado coupe for a cracked rear window in February. Four officers dragged Spence and his two passengers from the car and said they were under arrest for stealing it, he said.
“I tried to tell them it was my car, but they wouldn’t listen.”
Spence and his two friends were arrested, and the car was impounded. Charged with one count of motor vehicle theft, Spence represented himself in court in June.
“I owned the car — I knew it wasn’t stolen,” he said. Even though Spence had the title proving he owned the car, he said he was cleared of the charges because of the testimony of the owner of the stolen car. “The whole courtroom fell out — even the judge laughed,” Spence told The Examiner.
Still, police sold Spence’s car at auction two months before his day in court.
[Spence's lawyer] said the case also points out problems with the city’s management of stolen vehicles. “You have to question why a stolen car would be sold at all,” he said.
Police spokesman Matt Jablow said police are investigating the incident.
Spence said he only wants the Cadillac he worked so hard to buy.
“I loved that car.”
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 11:30 pm (UTC)[Spence's lawyer] said
I assume he retained a lawyer to get the car back?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-30 12:26 am (UTC)Frankly, I'm willing to bet the lawyer found him, when those charges got dropped. More than one lawyer, in fact. He may have even had to beat them off with sticks.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-30 12:48 am (UTC)But yes, I imagine the lawyers lined up to get a piece of this settlement...not that I really blame them.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-30 02:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-30 04:06 pm (UTC)