For the second year in a row, neo-Nazis have abused a loophole to put garbage onto the Hugo ballot, displacing nominees that were actually voted for by people who genuinely thought they were good. This year, though, instead of JUST a stream of bigoted effluvia, they've also included a handful of nominees that were good and had buzz as maybe getting onto the ballot legitimately on their own.
So I'm doing something slightly different than my rules for last year - instead of No Awarding all the neo-Nazi picks, I'm comparing them to the worst of my own picks. If something dropped onto the ballot by the white supremacist vandals is good enough that I would have considered nominating it myself had I seen it during the nomination period, it goes above No Award.
Same as last year, I'm doing breakdowns with my thoughts.
( this is pretty long )
( EDIT: Oh yeah, there's the retro-Hugos too. )
If you've made it all the way to here, have The Hugo Post Kitty.
So I'm doing something slightly different than my rules for last year - instead of No Awarding all the neo-Nazi picks, I'm comparing them to the worst of my own picks. If something dropped onto the ballot by the white supremacist vandals is good enough that I would have considered nominating it myself had I seen it during the nomination period, it goes above No Award.
Same as last year, I'm doing breakdowns with my thoughts.
( this is pretty long )
( EDIT: Oh yeah, there's the retro-Hugos too. )
If you've made it all the way to here, have The Hugo Post Kitty.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}