Why I hate corporate policies.
Jan. 8th, 2007 03:46 pmI have a new phone. It is a cellphone. It was a gift. It is quite spiffy, in most ways.
In some ways, it is not spiffy - and these are not TECHNICAL ways, nor are they necessary ways.
Basically, my phone can play all kinds of different audio files, as ringtones.
My phone can speak to my computer through four or five different ways.
The connection is obvious, right? Make your own ringtones! Hey, the manual for the phone model says you can do this! The website of the provider says you can customise your ringtones any way you want! And they link to the manual for the phone model when you ask how! That means it's easy, right?
Wrong.
You see, the provider (who shall remain nameless but whose name is similar to Irginvay Obilemay) LIES. When they say "customise it any way you want", they mean "you can get a 20 second ringtone, downloadable from our website, and your selection is very limited unless you like Justin Timberlake and Kevin Federline". They've DISABLED the functionality on the phone - actually crippled a listed sales feature on their site and the manufacturer's site.
And when I called support, their stated reason for doing so is "copyright concerns" - as in "you could get music or video from anywhere and out it on your phone".
#1: Uh, yeah. That's the whole reason that FEATURE exists, so I can produce or procure my own music and put it on my phone.
#2: Oh, and this is your business how, again? Copyright concerns? Right, because Dell is liable when people steal music, and Samsung is liable when people trade video tapes, and all that. Newsflash: copyright violation is *my* worry, *my* fault, and *my* liability, and since I have all the rights I will ever need and then some to the material I'm trying to use, I'm not worried. Since I'm not worried and it's NOT YOUR BUSINESS, why the fuck did you disable that feature?
#3: You don't prohibit me from copying it to my phone and playing it as "radio". That works just fine. So, let's take Metallica for a moment: Is playing the CD on my computer illegal? No? Is copying the CD to my computer illegal? No? Is copying it to my phone illegal? No? Is setting my phone to vibrate and manually queueing up the track every time I feel it illegal? No? Then why the fuck have you CRIPPLED MY PHONE to make it so that I can't do just that automatically?
(And if you start saying "yes, it's illegal" at any point, then I will do two things: First, I will point and laugh at your pathetic ignorance, and wonder out loud at your continued ability to breathe with that low level of brain function. Second, I will then point out that, illegal or not (not, for the record), I *can do* all of those, and so your prohibition doesn't actually stop me from infringing copyright)
#4: Hey, are you saying that you, as my provider, hold the position that YOU are responsible for any copyright infringements I make with my phone? That appears to be exactly what you're saying, and you've added functionality to ensure that I *can't* accidentally violate copyright! Wonderful! I've just queued up a Metallica album to automatically push itself to every Bluetooth source it sees, as soon as it sees them - and you're on the record as having said that YOU'RE responsible for all those violations that you're protecting me from! How wonderful that it's not my fault, your phone stopped me from doing anything *else* wrong so how was I to know that THAT was wrong?
The *real* reason they've used misleading advertising to sell a phone with the features they're advertising disabled is that for those 20 seconds of Justin Timberlake, it will cost you $4.
But I'm angry enough to make a stink about the misleading advertising, until I can get them to publically admit that.
In some ways, it is not spiffy - and these are not TECHNICAL ways, nor are they necessary ways.
Basically, my phone can play all kinds of different audio files, as ringtones.
My phone can speak to my computer through four or five different ways.
The connection is obvious, right? Make your own ringtones! Hey, the manual for the phone model says you can do this! The website of the provider says you can customise your ringtones any way you want! And they link to the manual for the phone model when you ask how! That means it's easy, right?
Wrong.
You see, the provider (who shall remain nameless but whose name is similar to Irginvay Obilemay) LIES. When they say "customise it any way you want", they mean "you can get a 20 second ringtone, downloadable from our website, and your selection is very limited unless you like Justin Timberlake and Kevin Federline". They've DISABLED the functionality on the phone - actually crippled a listed sales feature on their site and the manufacturer's site.
And when I called support, their stated reason for doing so is "copyright concerns" - as in "you could get music or video from anywhere and out it on your phone".
#1: Uh, yeah. That's the whole reason that FEATURE exists, so I can produce or procure my own music and put it on my phone.
#2: Oh, and this is your business how, again? Copyright concerns? Right, because Dell is liable when people steal music, and Samsung is liable when people trade video tapes, and all that. Newsflash: copyright violation is *my* worry, *my* fault, and *my* liability, and since I have all the rights I will ever need and then some to the material I'm trying to use, I'm not worried. Since I'm not worried and it's NOT YOUR BUSINESS, why the fuck did you disable that feature?
#3: You don't prohibit me from copying it to my phone and playing it as "radio". That works just fine. So, let's take Metallica for a moment: Is playing the CD on my computer illegal? No? Is copying the CD to my computer illegal? No? Is copying it to my phone illegal? No? Is setting my phone to vibrate and manually queueing up the track every time I feel it illegal? No? Then why the fuck have you CRIPPLED MY PHONE to make it so that I can't do just that automatically?
(And if you start saying "yes, it's illegal" at any point, then I will do two things: First, I will point and laugh at your pathetic ignorance, and wonder out loud at your continued ability to breathe with that low level of brain function. Second, I will then point out that, illegal or not (not, for the record), I *can do* all of those, and so your prohibition doesn't actually stop me from infringing copyright)
#4: Hey, are you saying that you, as my provider, hold the position that YOU are responsible for any copyright infringements I make with my phone? That appears to be exactly what you're saying, and you've added functionality to ensure that I *can't* accidentally violate copyright! Wonderful! I've just queued up a Metallica album to automatically push itself to every Bluetooth source it sees, as soon as it sees them - and you're on the record as having said that YOU'RE responsible for all those violations that you're protecting me from! How wonderful that it's not my fault, your phone stopped me from doing anything *else* wrong so how was I to know that THAT was wrong?
The *real* reason they've used misleading advertising to sell a phone with the features they're advertising disabled is that for those 20 seconds of Justin Timberlake, it will cost you $4.
But I'm angry enough to make a stink about the misleading advertising, until I can get them to publically admit that.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 08:54 pm (UTC)Yeah, that's a provider I'll never be subscribing to. Who is it?
I have Cingular, and my phone has a Bluetooth connection and can play MP3s. Which is why my ringtones are either the Final Fantasy Victory Theme (OK, maybe I've seen Advent Children one time too many) or the Katamari Damacy theme.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 09:04 pm (UTC)Right now, I'm looking at their licensed MP3s to figure out if it's just a tag on the MP3, which I can then duplicate, or if the phone actually phones home to the mothership and checks the catalog - in which case, Enter Sandman might get itself renamed "Virgin Mobile.mp3"
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 09:07 pm (UTC)Right. Note to self: Don't use them ever.
Enter Sandman
Who do you think you are, Billy Wagner? Mariano Rivera?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 09:17 pm (UTC)And the fact that I like Metallica is a very attractive bonus.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 09:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 10:28 pm (UTC)But I'm certainly lacking any incentive, at all, to stick with them once that money is used up.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 04:57 am (UTC)Please do...
Date: 2007-01-08 09:06 pm (UTC)on www.phonescoop.com
we'd like nothing better than to know all the details so that others can learn and make informed decisions.
Re: Please do...
Date: 2007-01-08 09:14 pm (UTC)Why don't *you* post the salient bits, under a title like "Virgin disables features on the Nokia 6275i (and doesn't mention it on the advertising)", and include a link to my post?
Re: Please do...
Date: 2007-01-08 09:25 pm (UTC)Re: Please do...
Date: 2007-01-08 10:23 pm (UTC)Which is why I said "Virgin disables features on the Nokia 6275i" as a suggested thread title.
Re: Please do...
Date: 2007-01-08 10:50 pm (UTC)Are you saying they disabled that program?
Off-topic
Date: 2007-01-09 06:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 09:08 pm (UTC)Although it stands to reason if somthing has been disabled then there is potentially a way to reenable it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 09:11 pm (UTC)They all fuck the corpses of meth addicted manatees.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 09:29 pm (UTC)Whether any other aspects of the bluetooth on that phone work are a complete mystery to me.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 05:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 06:02 pm (UTC)If Verizon owns the phone and he's renting it, then what he did may not have been legal.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 06:06 pm (UTC)You should email him for advice on circumventing Ergin-vay Obile-may, there might be a way to do it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 06:14 pm (UTC)Buying that hardware will cost me about $10, and the time it takes to ship. This frustrates me, because of the delay and because the *only* purpose of the hardware is to unlock the phone. I don't need that hardware for anything else, at all.
So what I'm doing is running through Virgin's tech tree, with a simple goal: They damaged my property, therefore they unlock my phone and I continue with Virgin, or I unlock my phone and I do not continue with Virgin.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 09:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 09:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 05:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 10:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 10:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 10:26 pm (UTC)What I want to be sure, though, is that the phone will still continue to work with Virgin, since I'm happy about pretty much everything except this one piece of crippled functionality.
The ability to modify the items on the main menu - so that the "multimedia" icon with the picture of the camera doesn't say "tunes" and so that VXL (Virgin's "please pay money to browse our crap and then more money to download it" function) doesn't appear at all - would be nice, too, but not required.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 10:41 pm (UTC)basically what you have is a cdma phone.. there is no sim card (the little chipy thing) with cdma, your phone contacts the mobil service providers servers to let them know which cell tower it can be reached at and that your phone is on.. leave your phone next to speakers or a old crt monitor and youll hear interference as it regularly updates its status wiht the providers servers..
Gsm uses Sim cards to keep your account info.. so you can switch phones as easily as switching the sim card into a different phone.. with your phone when you registered your phone they registered your iemi number which basically puts that number in their databases as a registered phone.. the software on the phone has nothing to do with the interaction between your phone and the servers.. (by that i mean they dont check the software versions and they cant bar your phone if you unlock it) also if you unlock your phone there might be a legal precident for action against your mobil company if they do bar you.. any mobil company makes you buy the phone.. and there fore it is your property and then you enter into a contract for the service.. im pretty certain that your contract doesnt stipulate any where that your phone must be running their software..
but worst case is it doesnt work.. and you take it back to one of their service centers and say "the software has a glitch in it and you dont know how it happened" unlocking nokias is a software unlock so there is no way they can prove that you did unlock it and there fore no way that they can prove you voided your warentee.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 11:31 pm (UTC)> your property and then you enter into a contract for the service..
> im pretty certain that your contract doesnt stipulate any where that
> your phone must be running their software..
Actually, Virgin runs Pay As You Go, with no contract whatsoever. You buy the phone outright, then it runs their software and talks to their system to get you online.
I want to be sure that I don't fuck up their stuff when I remove the DRM that's preventing me from legally using my property.
Either way, all the ways I know of to unlock a CDMA phone require software that I don't have (downloadable) and a direct cable that I don't have because I said "Hey, dirt-cheap bluetooth adapter? Why not use that? That's kinda neat".
Which was dumb of me, because now I've got bluetooth and no USB cable, and the DRM removal requires a USB cable.
Alternatively...
Date: 2007-01-09 04:49 am (UTC)Re: Alternatively...
Date: 2007-01-09 02:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 03:26 pm (UTC)that being said.. their software isnt proprietary.. the funny thing about the phone industry is that everything is soo standardized and old.. the tech that they are putting out now was available 2 years ago in europe and even longer ago in asia.. the telcos in north america are slow to adapt to new things and they are so against new technology that it isnt uncommon for a new product to be in testing for so long that its forgoten
even though its pay as you go.. all of your account information is handled on the back end on their servers and your phone has nothign to do wiht your pay as you go account.. thats how they can switch phones for you at any virgin booth with out you losing minutes..
as far as unlocking.. in a local mal around here there is a guy who can do it for you or has the tools to do so.. look for the booths with those flash cellphone covers / antennas. they should be able to get you the tools or point you to someone who can do it for you.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 10:29 pm (UTC)(And yes, they still believe it's Napster that's killing them. They're silly that way.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 11:00 pm (UTC)Napster doesn't do me any good as I have an iPod that doesn't do locked WMA and the like (only MP3, MP4/AAC, AIFF, ALE, and unlocked WMA), but it's interesting.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 11:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 10:43 pm (UTC)but i could be wrong.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 11:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 03:18 pm (UTC)the riaa cant do shit to us canadians.. and the canadian artist association wont do anything either.. we pay a levy on all blank media/ digital music players.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 10:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-08 11:07 pm (UTC)I'll give you three guesses as to why.
I have no way to verify this behaviour (i.e. my GF will not let me break and re-up her phone), so for now, it's just "grrrr...".
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 03:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 09:32 am (UTC)Well, in the UK, yes to all of the above, because our law is seriously that fucked up. But I understand Canada has sensible copyright laws.
It's possible their policies are set by head office, who might be over here and thus intelligence challenged? What with Virgin also being a record label and all...
Beyond that, yes, stupid, and I like the idea of your prerecords. My phone rings. We actually recorded a traditional old dial receiver at one point, because phones should ring, damnit!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 02:41 pm (UTC)So much so that *playing a music CD in a CD player* is illegal?
That, I'm impressed by.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 07:48 pm (UTC)