Interesting how the author goes to great lengths to make it appear like the costumes were somehow pornographic, but carefully avoids saying they actually were. Seems like all the furry porn angle was coming from the investigators, and not the guy selling the costumes. Maybe "guy busted for selling cheap knock-off Disney costumes" isn't a sexy enough story without the dirty movies connection to stir up public outrage.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-01 12:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-01 03:12 am (UTC)This is furry:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VirSwKCrbd8&eurl=
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-01 04:00 am (UTC)