that's because they aren't fully cognizant of the lack of any distinction. It's the same reason that some Christians say catholics are idolaters because they pray to statues, while catholics say they're just garnering the interscesion of the saints. If those folks were Shaktists I suspect they'd get the distinction, despite the professed belief in one supreme power. So I think it's fully ironic.
Dammit, what am I supposed to spot? That some of them are covering parts of the words? So that it says, "You shall have other gos before me," "Do not God's" and "do murder"?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-12 07:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-12 07:33 pm (UTC)*deep breath*
HAAAHAAA HAAAAAHAHAHAHA HAAAHAAABWAAAAHAHAHAHA!
Oh gods, my stomach hurts.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-12 07:48 pm (UTC)Is it the idol thing? Doesn't count, by any number of very short stretches.
Besides, in their minds they are bowing down before God, not the crappy representation of the tablets set before them.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-12 08:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-13 01:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-12 09:29 pm (UTC)Am I completely off track?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-12 09:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-12 09:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-12 09:47 pm (UTC)occurs?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-12 10:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-13 01:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-13 02:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-14 07:38 am (UTC)