(no subject)
Mar. 22nd, 2007 03:30 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
American judge strikes down anti-porn law.
Judge: I can't let this law stand because it violates free speech and a less intrusive option is easily available for people who want filters.
Government: But very few people choose to use that option!
Judge: That would be their decision AND MY POINT.
Judge: I can't let this law stand because it violates free speech and a less intrusive option is easily available for people who want filters.
Government: But very few people choose to use that option!
Judge: That would be their decision AND MY POINT.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-22 08:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-22 08:12 pm (UTC)To which I could only reply, "Er, don't get me wrong, but your kid is a TEENAGER, and we still lack the technology to be everywhere at once."
I mean, I find looking at porn in public kinda creepy, not to mention rude, in the way that dropping trou and pissing on the sidewalk is also creepy and rude (an event I have also been unfortunate enough to witness), but sheesh.
When porn is outlawed only outlaws will have porn. Or something.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-22 08:12 pm (UTC)There, fixed that for you.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-22 08:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-22 11:54 pm (UTC)