(no subject)
Apr. 27th, 2007 04:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Terrorists plant IED in Austin, TX. Nobody gives a shit because the only potential targets were women.
I'll say that again: TERRORISTS PLANTED A BOMB IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND NOBODY GIVES TWO SHITS.
And why? Because the terrorists in question are white, male, heterosexual, and Christian, and the US media and to a lesser degree the public doesn't care about anything white, male, straight Christians do to brown people, females, queers, and heathens.
Feministe has more, with more links.
I'll say that again: TERRORISTS PLANTED A BOMB IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND NOBODY GIVES TWO SHITS.
And why? Because the terrorists in question are white, male, heterosexual, and Christian, and the US media and to a lesser degree the public doesn't care about anything white, male, straight Christians do to brown people, females, queers, and heathens.
Feministe has more, with more links.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-27 09:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-27 09:30 pm (UTC)How is assuming that this crime was perpetrated by white male Christians any better ethically than assuming that any given suicide bombing was done by brown male Muslims?
Your all-caps rant is off, too. Do you suppose the police force just decided to call off the investigation once the bomb was detonated? Do you know how any of the local groups involved reacted? I care.
Just because this wasn't scooped up by every media outlet and at the top of every update doesn't mean that your logic holds.
Your underlying point is well-taken, but this post is a little over the top.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-27 10:16 pm (UTC)Actually, the assumption that any given suicide bombing was performed by a male muslim is actually pretty good - it's news when they're not.
The assumption that an abortion clinic bombing was performed by a white, male, heterosexual Christian is not only a good one, but
a) every one so far has been a white male heterosexual Christian
b) white male heterosexual Christians are the only ones who insist that abortion clinics should be bombed.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-29 03:19 am (UTC)Er, no. In 1987, The Center for Choice in Toledo was bombed by a woman. Marjorie something (hey, it's been 20 years).
Women DO bomb clinics, just not as often as men.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-29 05:16 am (UTC)That certainly invalidates my argument that it's *never* been the case, but I maintain that the core points remain: that this crime is not taken seriously because it's a terrorist act *by* heterosexual white Christians *against* "non-Christians"[1], and that the assumption of a white male heterosexual Christian at fault in an attempted bombing of an abortion clinic is just as valid as the assumption that a suicide bomber in the Middle East is going to be a male Muslim. It's like serial killers not being at-least-middle-class males: major, nigh-incredible news when it's not the case.
[1]: Where "non-Christian" is defined simply as "does not believe exactly as the terrorist believes"
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-30 10:47 am (UTC)The number of women who commit this crime is small, but it is not insignificantly so, and I personally think they're more dangerous than the men who do so, because they usually feel they have a lot more invested in their cause.
(I remembered the name of the woman in Toledo - Marjorie Reed. She set fire to the Toledo Clinic three times in the early and mid-80s, and bombed the Center for Choice in 1987.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-30 04:48 am (UTC)So... That's obviously the epitome of "anecdotal," but still, I'm just sayin'...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-30 05:51 am (UTC)I suspect "no" given his stance on the death penalty, but I'd like to know for the record.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-01 12:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-28 04:26 am (UTC)ping
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-28 06:33 pm (UTC)I also can't find anything online about his religious beliefs; do you have some source certifying that he's Christian?
This is a more complete article about the case, btw.
Also, this pro-life site has published a statement by Texas Alliance for Life director Joe Pojman repudiating the attack.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-29 02:32 am (UTC)I don't claim that that proves anything about motive, though.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-27 09:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-27 10:17 pm (UTC)(Was it the giant headline?)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-27 11:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-28 10:55 am (UTC)Shee-it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-04-28 11:43 am (UTC)