(no subject)
Sep. 11th, 2007 05:54 pmHey, remember the judge who ruled that the words "rape", "sexual assault", "victim", and "assailant", among others, were totally banned from a rape trial? As in, the jury weren't allowed to hear the accusation?
The victim's suing him.
The victim's suing him.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-11 11:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 12:08 am (UTC)Yes.
Yes she can.
She might not win, mind, and she might not even get to court if she doesn't have something to show that this was more than the judge making his own best judgement on the spot. If she does have more, however, it might actually work.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 04:44 am (UTC)The whole basis just seems peculiar to me. Are there any similar cases in which a judge was sued for, ah, "restricting free speech" during a trial?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 09:25 pm (UTC)OTOH, trainwreck...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 12:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-11 11:35 pm (UTC)