I can see the stinger merging into the surface of the Eye. Not sure if thats a shop or just someones worst day ever. For the poor buggers sake I hope it's a shop.
- had another look, it seems like the tongue's unrolled so the original must have been on a flower, as well as there being different focuses on the bee and the eye.
Not to mention there's not a man or woman alive wouldn't have blinked by this point
I dunno, the reflection skews the farther from the bee it gets. The stinger's reflected pretty neatly, though not perfectly undistorted, because it's right there, but the legs and, towards the bottom, the wings? That looks like how a curved surface reflects.
That, plus the bulge from surface tension where the stinger's being pulled out, and the jpg artifacting around the sting site, and how the bee is in focus with the eyelashes that would be an equivalent distance from the camera, and how the fuzziness of the bee's back would be nearly impossible to shop it ... it's a terrifying enough picture that I want it to be a shop, but I don't think it is. The photoshop guy I asked said he doesn't think it is either. If it is, it's a better shop than I've ever seen.
I saw that picture somewhere in the last week (probably wherever you ganked it from), and I will freely admit that my initial *shudder* has not lessened any in the meantime. Aaaaaaaggggggh!
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-01 11:19 pm (UTC)GAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-01 11:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-01 11:41 pm (UTC)But yeah. Neat, yes?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-01 11:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-01 11:54 pm (UTC)Not to mention there's not a man or woman alive wouldn't have blinked by this point
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-01 11:56 pm (UTC)(Goes back to hiding and twitching...)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 03:39 am (UTC)Neat?!
Date: 2007-10-01 11:55 pm (UTC)Oh HELLS No...
Eye, eye...
Date: 2007-10-02 06:13 am (UTC)Re: Eye, eye...
Date: 2007-10-02 08:14 pm (UTC)Re: Eye, eye...
Date: 2007-10-02 11:27 pm (UTC)Re: Eye, eye...
Date: 2007-10-03 01:57 am (UTC)Re: Eye, eye...
Date: 2007-10-03 03:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 02:34 pm (UTC)That, plus the bulge from surface tension where the stinger's being pulled out, and the jpg artifacting around the sting site, and how the bee is in focus with the eyelashes that would be an equivalent distance from the camera, and how the fuzziness of the bee's back would be nearly impossible to shop it ... it's a terrifying enough picture that I want it to be a shop, but I don't think it is. The photoshop guy I asked said he doesn't think it is either. If it is, it's a better shop than I've ever seen.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 04:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-01 11:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-01 11:49 pm (UTC)*girly scream*
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 12:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 01:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 02:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 02:18 am (UTC)http://mckenzee.comicgenesis.com/d/20070225.html
It's
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 03:18 am (UTC)And for an encore how about that comic about the gangter who goes into a gameshop to get the new Harry Potter game?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 03:22 am (UTC)I don't see it immediately in the archives. I know I've seen the comic, but I can't place the strip for sure.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 02:41 am (UTC)Jesus...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 10:45 am (UTC)I really like bugs, but this squicks even me.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-02 12:50 pm (UTC)