Cat-killer arrested, taken to jail, but cuts plea bargain so that he can pursue his dream of joining the military and doing it to humans instead.
Bonus points: US Military happily makes exceptions, re-arranges schedules so that he can join up.
Bonus points: US Military happily makes exceptions, re-arranges schedules so that he can join up.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 08:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 10:16 pm (UTC)...
Hello, my name is Jez, and I like cats a lot more than I like people.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-08 10:37 am (UTC)Then you're a psycopath.
Have you reacted so strongly to the fact that your government has been complicit in the murder of tens of thousands of Iraqi and Afghan civilians?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-08 03:54 pm (UTC)Maybe you meant "rabid misanthrope"?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-08 10:59 pm (UTC)http://ezinearticles.com/?Revisiting-The-Age-Old-Case-of-Diagnostic-Confusion-Sociopath-vs.-Psychopath&id=555698
Of course I think she's making a mithanthropic statement and probably being hyperbolic. Anyone who truly cares about animals more than people is emotionally retarded and I'll give her the benefit of the doubt that she is not. However, I made the statement to draw a parallel between her wish for violence and that perpetrated by the jerk in the story.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-09 02:42 am (UTC)(There may be an argument for taking the definitions of Dr. Hare over the definitions from the DSM-IV. However, I trust you will understand if I prefer to look into that myself, rather than merely adopting the preferred view of someone who drops into a conversation and tosses around vicious insults in the hopes of making a point. Thank you for bringing the alternate viewpoint to my attention.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-09 07:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-09 07:25 pm (UTC)In this case, the meaning of the word you were (mis)using is entire the point of this whole thread tangent, and she was neither caring more about animals than people nor defending someone who does.
She *did* care about the content of your comment - specifically, she questioning your use of the clinical term "psychopath", as well as correcting your spelling of it. The misspelling, of course, being another sign that you really probably didn't know what you were talking about. So she pointed out that you were using the wrong word, you argued your reason why it might be the right word, she said she'd look into that, and you called her stupid.
So. Right about now, the correct course of action is for you to reread your comments very carefully, realise that you're arguing against a statement that was never made, and apologise to
Are you going to do that?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-10 03:28 am (UTC)Whatever amusement value I thought I'd find after viewing your posts on a friend's friends page has certainly waned. I certainly used the term correctly in any but the most clinical sense and, arguably, even then. To play semantic games--and to suggest that a simple misspelling is germaine to discussing the primary point, is silly. If that's what passes for fun amongst your friends, I've grown weary of playing.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-10 04:42 am (UTC)And next time, remember: calling your host's wife "mentally defective" because you're not smart enough to understand a semantic disagreement? That's not very bright at all.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-10 05:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-08 01:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-08 01:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 08:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 08:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 09:13 pm (UTC)I seem to be sticking my foot in it quite a bit today... I'm gonna go over here and keep my mouth shut.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 11:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 10:33 pm (UTC)Imagine if she loved, say, a precious Ming vase, part of an ineffable collection - that is what he saw her cats as -something meaningful and valuable to her.
He was being clever - most people will say "it was just cats, FFS", but miss out just how cruel them loss will be to her.
As a (former) cat owner I know just how puissant her loss will be.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 11:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 11:10 pm (UTC)I wouldn't feel bad in the slightest about stomping someone who deliberately hurt my cat.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 11:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 11:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 11:49 pm (UTC)his options weren't a) hit his girlfriend or b) throw her cats
he could have chosen to throw dishes, throw books, slam doors, kick walls, whatever. These are all ways of expressing anger without causing physical harm to anyone except yourself. While sub-optimal, they are all infinitaly better than what he chose to do.
And hey, he could have also chosen to deal with the situation like a fucking grown-up instead of a sociopathic toddler.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-07 11:55 pm (UTC)Also, depending on the state, throwing or hitting inanimate objects in her presence can get him charged with domestic violence AND destruction of property.
And, yes.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-08 10:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-08 12:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-08 12:08 am (UTC)Considering the amount of force neccessary to kill a cat just via chucking...I'm guessing he's not exactly a light-weight.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-08 12:05 am (UTC)In what (wonderful) universe is hitting your girlfriend taboo?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-08 03:55 pm (UTC)(Abusing your SO is taboo in my social circle, but we're not the universe.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-08 03:58 pm (UTC)