(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 03:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quilzas.livejournal.com
I always wondered how people with 20+ piercings in their junk deal with airports. I would think that might start to be enough metal for the scanners to care.

But nipple piercings? Bloody hell.
Not to mention any fresh piercing runs the risk of closing over if the jewelry is taken out .. or infection. Sure, most flights aren't likely long enough for it to be an issue, but I cringe anyway.

When I flew last August with my new nipple piercings there was not a hair twitched about them. Happily. Didn't even think about it at the time.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geminiknight.livejournal.com
I've had to remove captive bead nipple rings with pliers before, that by itself isn't that big of a deal. The fact she had to remove them at all, and that they were laughing at her is bullshit.

Boobs of Mass Destruction!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-30 01:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Boobs of Mass Destruction!

I think it was Scott Adams that made the plea a while ago that some terrorist try to hide a bomb in a large brassiere, so that all women going through 'security' would have to take theirs off to be checked.

He was being amusing, but now...


Then there's also Wondermark's take on it:

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squizzlzilla.livejournal.com
PTFE sleepers if you need to use US airports, then. Or just have a revolution, 'cos I don't see the oppression stopping any other way.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com
And people act *surprised* when we say we don't want to visit the States...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhoye.livejournal.com
"TSA is well aware of terrorists' interest in hiding dangerous items in sensitive areas of the body, therefore we have a duty to the American public to resolve any alarm we discover," the agency said in a written statement.

Clearly bmezine is the new front in the war on terror.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
My uranium barbells keep my nipples warm.

pew pew pew

Date: 2008-03-30 01:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Have you gotten them to shoot lasers yet?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 03:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elffin.livejournal.com
Hey! Thugs flounting the rule of law!

I am just >< this far from marching up Olympus and demanding Poseidon flood the world.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 06:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
(Nudge .. nudge...) Go for it.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 03:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbankies.livejournal.com
I'm surprised she's not filing a lawsuit. Hell, I would.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-30 01:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
She has an attorney...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-wytchfyn.livejournal.com
She wasn't being 'watched':

"As Ms Hamlin struggled to remove the [second] piercing behind the curtain, she could hear a growing number of predominantly male TSA officers snickering in the background," the attorney said in the letter.

Oh. Em. Gee. The cool kids are laughing at me because I've spent ten minutes failing to get my second piercing out and have had to be offered a set of pliers! Oh, the humanity!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com
Uhm, yeah.

Because being a half-naked woman who's been obliged to do something that normally only your personal physician would have *any* reasonable right to request of you, while only a piece of fabric is shielding you from a bunch of men who have some authority over you and have demonstrated that they have absolutely no inclination to treat you as if you were a person deserving of any respect or dignity--hey, that's *totally* not the sort of situation a reasonable person should object to.

Unless they actually have some weird expectation of being treated like a person.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 06:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pope-guilty.livejournal.com
I wish LJ had some kind of comment rating system, just for a moment, so that I could highly rate this comment.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 06:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Metaquotes is kind of like that.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 06:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silmaril.livejournal.com
I wished the same thing when I read the comment [livejournal.com profile] torrain replied to.

Except to rate it rather low, of course.

Empathy, let me show you it.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-29 03:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-wytchfyn.livejournal.com
Been X-rayed by border guards. Been interviewed through bullet proof glass where the assumption was that I was a visa risk. Been put in holding areas. Citizen of a third world country, let me show you it.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
Wow, you REALLY don't find the whole thing to be rather intrusive and humiliating? You must have an iron stomach.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
Not to mention an iron heart..

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-29 03:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-wytchfyn.livejournal.com
Of course it's humiliating. That's what airline security is, whether it's people snooping through your underwear or x-raying your bags. Myself, I've been compelled (by the Brits) to submit chest X-rays* before they'd let me into their green and pleasant land - talk about medical imperatives being misapplied. So - humiliating? Sure. Intrusive? Sure. That's the panopticon at work.

What I won't concede is that having to remove a nipple ring behind a curtain is SO MUCH WORSE OMG that we need to publically validate this woman's torturedness and do a round of headshaking.

* - to show I wasn't some kind of TB-raddled African or something

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-28 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
And people say I over-react to the whole TSA thing? That they don't want to risk terrorists on the planes? That the TSA is NEEDED?
I don't THINK SO- this is BullSH*T of the first degree... no- wait.. -BUSH-SH*T of the first degree.

There's more...

Date: 2008-03-28 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goaltender.livejournal.com
Unfortunately, I must admit I can't site this information from a more credible source, but the guys on the radio this morning said she also had a navel peircing that she was NOT required to remove.

And to those of you bitching about the TSA; I agree with you. So, what do we do instead? Just desolve it and fly like we did pre-9/11, or put something else in place?

Re: There's more...

Date: 2008-03-28 10:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jsbowden.livejournal.com
Yes, dissolve it. Passengers will never sit idly by again and allow a plane to be commandeered.

Re: There's more...

Date: 2008-03-28 11:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
Yes, dissolve the TSA. Now. It's a needlessly intrusive instrument, costing more in time, money, and human dignity than it is generating actual safety and security. It's become obsessed with nailclippers and shampoo and shoes instead of its proper function.

Chuck it and spit in the eye of the terrorists, or keep it and do exactly what they intended when they perpetrated 9/11.

-- Steve'd also like it if you ditched MiniTru* the Department of Homeland Security, for the same reasons.

*C'mon, you just know they were reading 1984 when they hatched that name out.

Re: There's more...

Date: 2008-03-28 11:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sivi-volk.livejournal.com
The creepy thing was working with NAFTA Certificates of Origin for goods coming from the States on official "Homeland Security: Dept. of Border Control" forms.

Re: There's more...

Date: 2008-03-29 12:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com
Seconded.

(Also I would like it if they ditched DHS because I took a certain trivia/trivial pleasure in the Secret Service belonging to the Department of the Treasury. But that is a truly minor thing.)

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 12:22 pm