(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-30 07:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
You know... paint me less than distraught over this, But it wouldn't make me cry if the dumbcluck found himself PERMANENTLY un-employed...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-31 03:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elffin.livejournal.com
He lost his liability insurance; That means he can't be employed by a lot of pharmacies unless he manages to self-insure.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-31 10:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
Yeah- good luck to him on THAT count... I don't think even Lloyd's of London would touch him with a 40-foot pole.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-30 09:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] missysedai.livejournal.com
Noesen said the discipline "critically devastated" his business as a traveling pharmacist because some pharmacies refused to hire him and he lost his liability insurance, court records said.


GOOD! Because I shouldn't have to fucking argue for my right to access to my LEGALLY PRESCRIBED MEDICATION.

Do your godsdamned job or get the fuck out of the profession. You knew what you were getting into when you signed up for it.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-31 01:41 am (UTC)
ext_15025: Photo by me (Default)
From: [identity profile] dracodraconis.livejournal.com
In Canada, Pharmacists are legally required to provide an alternative source for "time critical" medication like the "morning-after" pills. I can't recall for certain if the US (or at least the individual states) has similar legislation, but I believe they do, hence the ruling against the pharmacist.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-31 03:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elffin.livejournal.com
Not legislation /per se/ but the professional ethics applied by the licensing boards. He violated the ethics. He also happened to be practicing medicine without a license.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 01:45 am