(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-15 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] themanabides.livejournal.com
That is absolutely the luckiest find in the history of photography.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-15 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unknownpoltroon.livejournal.com
Photoshop? Very good photoshop?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-15 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I suspect so.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-15 09:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zdallin.livejournal.com
I was thinking the same thing - no one could be that lucky - but damn it's good.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-16 10:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] corruptedjasper.livejournal.com
Someone could of course *arrange* for that thing to be there in real life.

Sometimes, you'd think that nobody ever faked anything physically any more because photoshop would be easier.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-17 07:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zdallin.livejournal.com
You mean... people could fake things before photoshop came along!?

You're right of course, although even *finding* a tree with a branch that looked like that would be nearly impossible.

Looking more closely at it though, you can see some distortion in the clouds around the fingers... I'm tempted to think someone took the easy way out ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-15 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
Poor Ent...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-16 04:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Clint Eastwood?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-18 12:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bastige.livejournal.com
I believe that is the Castle Aargh from the end of the Monty Python and the Holy Grail (Castle Stalker in Argyll).

Image (http://www.answers.com/Castle%20Stalker?ff=1)

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 03:18 am