(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-04 11:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Indeed it is!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-05 01:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] icedrake.livejournal.com
I suspected Jews For Jesus, but their logo is less inventive. Kind of boring, really.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-05 12:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maskedretriever.livejournal.com
Well, given that Jesus was, theoretically, a Jew, and that, theoretically, Leviticus is still in effect, then... theoretically, this makes perfect sense.

Theoretically.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-05 12:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sparkindarkness.livejournal.com
One of Armstrong's lot perhaps? I think they're a kind of Seven Day Adventists with extra extra extra whackiness

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-05 04:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leighdb.livejournal.com
I'm so going to start saying this to people.

At random.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-05 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chaosrah.livejournal.com
jews for jesus piss me off...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-05 08:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skington.livejournal.com
Previously (http://theweaselking.livejournal.com/2614219.html)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-06 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marco262.livejournal.com
I don't know what amuses me more...the bacon reference...

Or that the whole message is apparently in quotes.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 5th, 2026 09:45 pm