I love living in the future.
May. 27th, 2008 12:20 pmCold Fusion!
Hopefully, this one pans out. The guy who did it says it's reproducible, since he's done it repeatedly so far.
Hopefully, this one pans out. The guy who did it says it's reproducible, since he's done it repeatedly so far.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-27 05:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-27 06:00 pm (UTC)Let's leave the champagne in the bottle and have Baby Duck instead
Date: 2008-05-27 06:18 pm (UTC)Re: Let's leave the champagne in the bottle and have Baby Duck instead
Date: 2008-05-27 07:19 pm (UTC)And the whole point is that, once you've duplicated it yourself a few times, then you share your procedure and OTHER people duplicate it, before it's considered Real Science(tm)
Cheers!
Date: 2008-05-27 07:53 pm (UTC)Re: Cheers!
Date: 2008-05-27 10:54 pm (UTC)Now we just need plenty of independent duplication.
Re: Cheers!
Date: 2008-05-28 12:37 am (UTC)Here is a link similar to that provided by the King but with different commentary: http://physicsworld.com/blog/2008/05/coldfusion_demonstration_a_suc_1.html
Re: Cheers!
Date: 2008-05-28 12:45 am (UTC)Re: Cheers!
Date: 2008-05-28 12:58 am (UTC)It might very well not be proper fusion and it needs duplication for certain, but the physics (specifically the anomalous heat production) has been supported by peer review.
Re: Cheers!
Date: 2008-05-28 01:17 am (UTC)Re: Cheers!
Date: 2008-05-28 01:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-27 06:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-27 08:54 pm (UTC):-)
A.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-27 10:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 01:46 am (UTC)What disturbs me so much about all of these accounts is that they offer no explanation as to how these nuclei are being made to fuse at all. Sonofusion, that was cool. Something calling itself "cold fusion" and not describing the physical principles behind it?
I'll be pointedly not holding my breath.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 03:31 am (UTC)I hope we figure this out.