theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking
Her MySpace says she's 19, divorced, and looking for no-strings sex.

Her 22-year-old lover is going to prison, because she's lying, she's actually 13.

Bonus: He's not the first guy to be fooled. And not the first to go to jail.

Guess the state!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-02 03:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_jeremiad/
So you'd be okay with getting rid of statutory rape laws and perhaps having a situation where a child molester, in his defense, says a minor consented to having sex with him/her?

And I'm okay with the sex offender registry. Sex offenders have high rates of recidivism. It's a good idea to keep track of them.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-02 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I didn't say I had a better solution, only that I don't like the current one.

And we're STILL not talking about consent, at all, here.

I'm okay with the sex offender registry. Sex offenders have high rates of recidivism. It's a good idea to keep track of them.

In principle, sure, I agree with you.

In practice, there are people on the registry who shouldn't be there, and being on the registry itself is a massively increased punishment that never, ever goes away - regardless of your recidivism, or lack thereof.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-02 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_jeremiad/
That sounds like an argument for reducing the number of crimes that would put you on the registry not for getting rid of the registry all together.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 03:27 pm