(no subject)

Jun. 9th, 2008 09:27 pm
theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking
American torturers destroying the evidence to keep from being prosecuted isn't new. Finding the written order to shred the evidence to avoid prosecution is.
Threaded | Flat

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-10 01:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unknownpoltroon.livejournal.com
DO YOU WANT THE TERRARISTS TO WIN?!?!?!

Hmm...

Date: 2008-06-10 03:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ysabetwordsmith.livejournal.com
Isn't "destruction of evidence" sort of illegal?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-10 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sparkindarkness.livejournal.com
That's just contempt - they're not even bothering to do a proper cover up any more, so little do theyc are about being held accountable

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-11 02:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmseward.livejournal.com
Hey John, thought you might get a kick out of this: http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tv/story/2008/06/09/fox-mosque.html

Fox?!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-14 07:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atlasimpure.livejournal.com
...this level of ineptitude would be fucking hilarious if it was anything other than torture.
Threaded | Flat

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 01:58 pm