(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 12:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
Oh ... this could only be Florida...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 12:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox7oaks.livejournal.com
D'oh! just when I think I have them pinned...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 12:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stormfeather.livejournal.com
Yeah, my own thought was "yup, that's the Fla. crazies for ya..." but bzzzt.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 05:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlo.livejournal.com
I thought so too.

I guess I'm glad it's not. Let's thin out the voting crazy.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 12:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jagash.livejournal.com
Well hey, provided that the poll workers are a representative of the total population, it might be _more_ democratic then leaving the rigged machines to make the decisions.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 12:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
No, because certain workers are much more likely to have, say, hypothetically, a large mechanism in place with which to cheat, which also *made the machines* and hence knows exactly how to change them.

Basically, your theory requires that
A) a voting system run by Republicans have a standard average distribution of poll workers
B) all poll workers be equally likely to cheat
C) all cheaters have equal ability to cheat

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jagash.livejournal.com
I was mostly assuming that the results had been predetermined and accordingly there was no need to modify the results after the fact. I did state the requirement for A upfront.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 02:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harald387.livejournal.com
...I really honestly thought this was going to lead to an Onion article.

How do The Onion stay in business, again? When reality is THIS FUCKING DUMB...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 04:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gilmoure.livejournal.com
When I was a bank teller, I tried to talk them into letting me have the cash sleep over at my house. They weren't going for it.

Sigh.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 08:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glitteringlynx.livejournal.com
bahahaha

Hey, it was worth a shot. ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 07:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glitteringlynx.livejournal.com
D:

*hugs Canada's ballot boxes*

I'm all for reducing paper but... for a vote? PAPER FOREVER!!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
Man ... I was really hoping not to win this one. My CITY even! At least it's a story about NOT doing something stupid rather than about how we're GOING to do something stupid for once. or worse, how we already did it and nobody cares.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
At least it's a story about NOT doing something stupid
Not so fast:
"Counties may also set up regional storage locations where poll workers can pick up machines on the morning of Election Day and take them to polling locations."

They're still allowing unrestricted access to the voting machines, away from security, for periods of time.

They're just not doing it *overnight* any more.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-20 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elffin.livejournal.com
They did it in the 2000 and 2004 elections, too.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 5th, 2026 02:30 pm